Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2024

File:Gehrenspitze Tannheim Tyrol Austria.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2024 at 20:26:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 20:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As at QI candidate site written: Many pixels but finally not really sharp. Now your 2nd version (20:06, 26 July 2024) is much better but in my opinion it is no featured picture because the mountain has too much haze and is in the shadow. --2015 Michael 2015 (talk) 14:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
According to Google Maps measurements in a straight line there are 10 kilometers from where this photo was taken, I think it would hardly be sharper. Wilfredor (talk) 17:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Because of the improved sharpness I voted it as QI; featured picture: see above. 2015 Michael 2015 (talk) 12:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Impala (Aepyceros melampus) female with red-billed oxpecker Kruger.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2024 at 17:27:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
Info Another oxpecker; but this one is not hiding... All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Confused by your croping, sometime 30 % of negative space and this one merely maybe 3% vertical. Any reason ? --Mile (talk) 19:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If you look, there is no crop. I decided to eliminate more space than usual in the composition to get the bird as large as possible. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:37, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would have liked a composition without so many elements more, but that still makes it a good shot, in a natural environment with very elusive or surly animals. --Wilfredor (talk) 21:20, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's amazing this bird traveled from an impala to a giraffe :-) Maybe something to say :-) Basile Morin (talk) 03:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment That's why it was on the podium at the mammal-perching Olympics. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:50, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 07:02, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I swear I saw that same oxpecker in a similar nomination. --Zzzs (talk) 15:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Benji 18:46, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:23, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Quality is good but the top crop is too tight and the composition is too cluttered to me, sorry. I don't think this is a FP. Poco a poco (talk) 17:55, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 15:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:34, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 00:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice image, technically very well made. But I think the composition is overcrowded and makes it hard to enjoy the best parts like the bird and the animal it is sitting on. --August (talk) 07:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose @Charlesjsharp I will use this words "No need for a half-bird". I put you what crop would be much more interesting and your goal "bird as large as possible" would be achieved. --Mile (talk) 10:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)

File:Babosa de mar (Pteraeolidia ianthina), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-23, DD 94.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2024 at 17:35:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Gastropoda
Info Blue dragon (Pteraeolidia ianthina), Anilao, Philippines. This sea slug, of a length of about 7 centimetres (2.8 in), is widespread throughout the Indo-Pacific and can be fount at a dept of up to 30 metres (98 ft). Pteraeolidia has evolved a method of capturing and farming microscopic plants (zooxanthellae) in its own body. The plants flourish in this protected environment and as they convert the sun's energy into sugars, they pass a significant proportion on to the nudibranch for its own use. The slug gains enough photosythetically derived sugars to sustain it without feeding. Note: we have no FPs of the genus Pteraeolidia. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 20:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 20:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 20:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 20:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Plant organism :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another exceptional underwater image --Tagooty (talk) 04:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:27, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A stunning creature. – Aristeas (talk) 18:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 01:58, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:29, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:00, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Famberhorst (talk) 04:26, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class : Gastropoda

File:Miradouro das Rocas 2023-03-13.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2024 at 14:51:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: view from Miradouro das Rocas, Peneda-Gerês National Park; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not bad for a smartphone shot but the artefacts in the corners are not the quality an FP should have. I think the light is a bit unspectacular.--Ermell (talk) 20:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 15:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:32, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colorful sky with orange and pink clouds reflecting in the water of a paddy field at dusk in Don Det Laos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2024 at 01:13:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Clouds
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support So beautiful -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:07, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes. ★ 02:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding combination of colour, lighting and reflections. --Tagooty (talk) 04:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I did want to plus it, but buildings behind are really not so OK. Could be a bit more sharp and focused-on. --Mile (talk) 12:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Sharpened. At F/13, the background should be in focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 15:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:58, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support quality is so-so, i would expect beter but atmosphere added some value, colors, water, farm. --Mile (talk) 18:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The return of the Wow. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:29, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tmv (talk) 00:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support but per mile.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 21:54, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great sky. – Aristeas (talk) 14:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:04, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:40, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Clouds

Mapas de España y Portugal - por el ingeniero de minas D. Federico de Botella y de Hornos, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2024 at 21:17:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Europe
Info created by Federico de Botella y de Hornos - uploaded by Gzen92Bot - nominated by ★ -- ★ 21:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 21:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good scans of two beautiful classic maps, complementing each other to give a perfect impression of geology and topography of the Iberian Peninsula. We usually prefer digitally restored scans of such old works, but in this case I think the markings and even fingerprints on the borders emphasize the historical character of these documents. – Aristeas (talk) 07:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:27, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 15:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Europe

File:Bhaga River Darcha Gemur Lahaul Jun24 A7CR 00231.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2024 at 04:06:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info Bhaga river flowing from Darcha at the base of the snony range past Jispa, view looking upstream from above Gemur Gompa. Elevations: River 3,250 m (10,660 ft), peaks 5,200–5,700 m (17,100–18,700 ft). Lahaul, Himachal Pradesh, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 15:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 19:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 01:58, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Great composition! --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 03:40, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Striking image. —Bruce1ee^talk 07:51, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 08:43, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:29, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:29, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tmv (talk) 01:09, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 21:54, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#India

File:Fuerza Armada Nacional de Venezuela.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2024 at 11:56:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Soldiers
Info The National Armed Forces of Venezuela, an image that is extremely difficult to take due to the dictatorial circumstances of the country. All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 15:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Light does not work for me. Face in the shadow -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:55, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment After posting this nomination, Wikipedia was blocked in this country shortly after. I don't think there is any relation to this nomination, but I thought it was important to mention it.[1] --Wilfredor (talk) 04:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:52, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bamberg Hain Hirschkäfer focus stacked-20240520-RM-103648.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2024 at 19:26:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Lucanidae (Stag Beetles)
Info All by me -- Ermell (talk) 19:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 19:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 01:57, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality and PoV at creature's scale -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! I looked at this at full resolution and I think I'll probably have nightmares tonight. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 03:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:41, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--ArildV (talk) 08:21, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot! --Harlock81 (talk) 08:27, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:10, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:29, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The shooting angle is exceptional --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:27, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support ... and a professional stack. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:07, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support This is some impressive detail. How did you do it? --Zzzs (talk) 16:38, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Info The picture is rotated 90° cw. The beetle was sitting on the trunk of an oak tree and wanted to climb upwards. During a motionless moment I was able to take a series of freehand pictures which I then merged in Helicon Focus. --Ermell (talk) 22:32, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:26, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 21:29, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:20, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 04:32, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing. --Phyrexian ɸ 08:14, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:03, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:14, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 21:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:40, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:27, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family : Lucanidae (Stag Beetles)

File:Hastula albula 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2024 at 16:21:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Terebridae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 16:21, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 16:21, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:01, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 01:57, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:28, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:29, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:28, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:38, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:23, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:02, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:41, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Terebridae

File:Common noddy (Anous stolidus pileatus) in flight Michaelmas Cay.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2024 at 21:00:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Anous
Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Zzzs -- Zzzs (talk) 21:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zzzs (talk) 21:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 01:16, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 01:55, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well frozen in flight -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Manggadua (talk) 03:40, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Struck vote. User does not meet the voting requirements (2 out of 50 edits) --Zzzs (talk) 05:53, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is there anything that you might be able to do to make the bird's face look less posterized? The wings look good, but the face looks processed. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 03:48, 28 July 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]
I'm not the author of the image, and I don't know how to fix images, but I suppose @Charlesjsharp: , the author, can fix it. --Zzzs (talk) 04:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the nomination Support. New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:21, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question: where is the new version? --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:59, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Oops. Distracted by the Olympics... Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You weren't the only one. --Zzzs (talk) 16:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @The Cosmonaut to notify him of the new version Zzzs (talk) 21:54, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:29, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:25, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 15:44, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:20, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Phyrexian ɸ 08:13, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:47, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:04, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:15, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 15:22, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 21:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:40, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:31, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Anous

File:Gray Jay perched on a globe.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2024 at 23:16:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Corvidae_(Crows,_Jays_and_Magpies)
Info created by Serena-Wilderness - uploaded by Serena-Wilderness - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 23:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Henrysz (talk) 23:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 01:35, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Seems underexposed / gray to me. Also possibly downsized, because the image measures exactly 2000 px large (that's not huge) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:15, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Lovely composition, but low on detail. File size 392 KB is rather small. Do you have a higher res, higher quality version? --Tagooty (talk) 04:15, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not my photo, and as far as I can tell the photographer had a single burst of activity in 2022 and is no longer active. I only nominated this because I was strongly "wowed" by it, and in my opinion the low quality does not preclude it from being FP as there are some recent successful nominations with a similar resolution. But of course that's up for debate Henrysz (talk) 06:37, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
some examples because why not:

File:Scoliid wasp (Megascolia bidens) male Cap Bon 2.jpg

File:STS-135 Atlantis' final tow back.jpg

File:Zara Larsson @ The Observatory OC 05 02 2019 (48498569766).jpg Henrysz (talk) 06:45, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hardy a sensible image to choose to make your point. Wasps are not quite as large as birds and the resolution of the wasp photo is HUGE compared with this... Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The resolution in the Space Shuttle image is WAY larger (5,988,000 pixels, more than doubled) compared to the image you're nominating (2,666,000 pixels). --Zzzs (talk) 17:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And 2.74 MB is much more than 392 KB. High JPG compression rate in this case -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The above discussion indicates that the image cannot be improved, per my comment above. --Tagooty (talk) 10:52, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree, underexposed, WB off, too small Poco a poco (talk) 17:58, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Water buffalo bathing with water reflection at golden hour in Don Det Laos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2024 at 05:45:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:29, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 15:43, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 21:28, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 15:23, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:21, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Only the head, eyes and nostrils protrude above the water surface, or so I thought. Wolverine XI 13:14, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ears also, horns and back :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 2 August 2024 (UTC)--Wolverine XI 19:49, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)

File:SnowyOwlAmericanBlackDuck.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2024 at 18:17:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Strigidae_(True_Owls)
Info created by Needsmoreritalin - uploaded by Needsmoreritalin - nominated by Needsmoreritalin -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 18:17, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 18:17, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I was about to nominate this image. Thanks. --Zzzs (talk) 18:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I have a few more in the series. Wings open, wings up. Should I upload or is that overkill. (no pun intended.) Needsmoreritalin (talk) 21:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Always. We're happy to see them :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support YES. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:24, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Please, What happened to the animal that is taking from the ground, it is not clearly distinguished --Wilfredor (talk) 21:27, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a young Snowy Owl. It was sitting in a tidal mudflat eating an American Black Duck and I approached it slowly in mid-calf high mud to get the sun and the wind at my back and observed it eating. As the tide started coming in, the owl tried to bring its quarry to higher ground, but it struggled to drag and make a few short bounding flights with the duck. I have more images I can post. What you are seeing is that the owl ate around the duck's neck and when it flow, the duck's head was dangling from its body, held on my its esophagus and trachea. I know it is grim. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 21:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Did it snap off? Also, is this the full resolution? Zzzs (talk) 00:09, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, the head remained connected. When the tide started coming in, the owl had to give up. The Black Duck was just too heavy for it to carry to higher ground. This is full resolution, cropped significantly. I was shooting with the 18MP Canon 7D and the 100-400mm. I got as close as I could without bothering the owl. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:33, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Does the original image have a geocoded location? If so, can you provide the coordinates? Zzzs (talk) 17:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here you go!

43.442354, -70.362423

Biddeford, Maine 04005 Needsmoreritalin (talk) 20:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:15, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:53, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tmv (talk) 00:18, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent light, bird well frozen in flight, very captivating action. A bit gory, yes, it's wild life. It would be even better if the metadata exif were there -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I saved it as a JPG in 2013, and I tried to upload a replacement as a PNG, but it wouldn't take it. My PNGs have the Exif. Here is the info:

Canon 7D

EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM

Focal Length 400mm

1/3200

F/8

ISO 320 Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Added there -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a special template for this: {{Photo Information}} that you can add to photos where the EXIF is missing. --Cart (talk) 09:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That is helpful. Someone put the meta data in already, but I can use this to fix some older images. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 20:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great shot, but the license is incompatible with Commons ("For non-commercial use only. Must use attribition as follows: Chuck Homler / FocusOnWildlife.Me"). We don't support non-commercial clauses. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the restriction. Thank you for pointing that out. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:03, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support thanks — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:36, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:18, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive scenery of the cruelty of wild life. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Technically very good, no motion blur here --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:47, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 11:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:09, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:18, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some might say it small. --Mile (talk) 15:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 21:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August (talk) 07:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 12:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:20, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Strigidae_(True_Owls)

File:Синие пламя.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2024 at 06:56:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Microscopic_images_of_crystals
Info created by SergRussu - uploaded by SergRussu - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 06:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Henrysz (talk) 06:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Having no idea how these images are made, I found this explanation. No idea if this image used a waveplate or some other technique like masking to add the colours. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support but more information needed. Yann (talk) 10:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 21:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 08:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another incredibly beautiful pattern design by mother nature. – Aristeas (talk) 08:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pretty unremarkable to me. Wolverine XI 19:01, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 20:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty amazing images. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Need to see a much better explanation in the image descriptioin of what this is and how the image was made, in order that this image is useful in Commons going forward. --GRDN711 (talk) 12:41, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Wolverine XI. -- Karelj (talk) 10:57, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:06, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Microscopic_images_of_crystals

File:Prise de la Bastille clean.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2024 at 18:39:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Historical
Info created by Jean-Pierre Houël / digitized by the French National Library (BNF), uploaded and nominated by Yann
Info A recent FPC was withdrawn soon after the its nomination.
Support Slightly edited version, just white balance corrected with a bit more light, as the paper and the artwork have yellowed a little due to time. -- Yann (talk) 18:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:32, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Phyrexian ɸ 08:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Others#Historical

File:Snowy egret (72749).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 02:12:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Egretta
Info Snowy egret (Egretta thula) stares into the water in the middle of a pond. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It should be possible to rescue the blown highlights on the wings -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:15, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- new version uploaded - some recovered, but it is quite white. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 22:18, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:11, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful reflections in the regular waveforms; an impression of balance through the space allowed to breathe in the upper two-thirds of the image. The benefits of the composition outweigh minor technical shortcomings. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent and beautiful composition. – Aristeas (talk) 14:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very uninteresting as thumb, but nice when zoomed. --Mile (talk) 14:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wonder what the bird was thinking at that moment --Zzzs (talk) 01:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:26, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:29, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:36, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Egretta

File:Cicada killer (73200).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 01:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family_:_Crabronidae_(Crabronids_Wasps)
Info A cicada killer (Sphecius speciosus) perched on a black-eyed susan (Rudbeckia hirta). One of the largest wasps in North America, the females dig nests and hunt cicadas while the males fight each other for territory. For a few weeks in the summer, they can be quite a spectacle -- especially the males, giant wasps constantly fighting over patches of dirt. This is the first time I've seen them perch on flowers to defend territory, so it made a good photo opportunity. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:47, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great, like autumn shot. --Mile (talk) 15:14, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 15:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 21:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 14:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:39, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:36, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family_:_Crabronidae_(Crabronids_Wasps)

File:Hypolais polyglotte Haouaria012.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 10:37:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Acrocephalidae (Leaf, or Marsh Warblers)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:47, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Clear, sharp image with wonderfully soft background. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 14:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:54, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just maybe, some 50 px crop on right. --Mile (talk) 15:14, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Mile.--Ermell (talk) 15:24, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:15, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:28, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Luc Viatour (talk) 14:15, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Acrocephalidae (Leaf, or Marsh Warblers)

File:Itaunas ceu de dunas 09 (cropped).JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 19:54:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Sun
Info created and initially uploaded by Alessandro Diniz Coutinho - cropped and nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:54, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Resembles the Flag of Niger. -- ★ 19:54, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good composition but the image size and quality are very low --Wilfredor (talk) 18:46, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 15:51, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ponta da Ferraria panorama.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2024 at 00:14:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: panoramic view of Ponta da Ferraria; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Don't love how part of the road is cropped, but since it's minor, it'll do for me. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 15:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:34, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 10:17, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:31, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Portugal

File:Pollen grain of Helichrysum.png, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 22:11:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Pollen
Info created by Pavel.Somov - uploaded by Pavel.Somov - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 22:11, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 22:11, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Its amazing that something so small can cause so much misery, each spring. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It would be useful to add a reference dimension to the picture or add information about the dimensions of the pollen grain in the description of the image. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fascinating structure -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:01, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 20:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Luc Viatour (talk) 14:15, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:32, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Pollen

File:Waterloopbos, 24-06-2024. (actm.) 09.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2024 at 04:28:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
Info Waterloopbos, detail of the monumental work of art Deltawerk // formerly Delta Flume. (artists RAAAF en Atelier de Lyon). A narrow high space between two works of art with horizontal supports gives (in my opinion) this a special spatial effect.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with your opinion. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An interesting example of vanishing point photography. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:16, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:09, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 06:29, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 09:02, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 10:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support! --Terragio67 (talk) 17:53, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual eye-catching perspective. --Tagooty (talk) 05:27, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice composition but could be focus-stacked to get the foreground in focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:42, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:32, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Others

File:Alawid architecture Ahl Fas Mosque, Rabat.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2024 at 08:37:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Morocco
Info Alawid architecture “Ahl Fas Mosque”, Rabat. My shot. --Mile (talk) 08:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 08:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unremarkable. I don't know what I'm looking at. Wolverine XI 13:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The photo made me stop almost instinctively. It's not the building that I find attractive. There may be better photos of buildings. The special thing about the picture is the combination of geometric shapes and different color surfaces. That alone is excellent for me. --XRay 💬 20:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment True, i didnt concentrate just on mosque (photo which i had too), but all those shapes and was moving around that spot till i find this as best. White wall, green roof and mosque. So i put "architecture" and not just "mosque". --Mile (talk) 12:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm asking myself if a sky without clouds had resulted more effective in this recall to the representation of shapes and volumes. --Harlock81 (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Harlock81 Probably would. --Mile (talk) 18:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support XRay's aesthetics. ★ 02:00, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 15:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per XRay. – Aristeas (talk) 18:16, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Wolverine XI. -- Karelj (User talk:Karelj 09:35, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good, but the compo isn't outstanding to me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:37, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- per XRay.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:31, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:36, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just like XRay's reasons to support. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 17:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:24, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Morocco

File:CH.VD.Yvonand 2021-08-29 Seaplane-Meeting 10869 16x9-R 9K.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2024 at 09:06:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Propeller_aircraft
Info HB-PMN at Seaplane-Meeting in Yvonand 2021 – created and uploaded by Roy Egloff - nominated by Augustgeyler -- August (talk) 09:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- August (talk) 09:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:28, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well captured, high resolution image, and very sharp for a moving subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:15, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile – and good, quiet background. – Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:58, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 10:43, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:40, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Propeller_aircraft

File:Negro drinking at "Colored" water cooler in streetcar terminal, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma by Russell Lee.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2024 at 13:41:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1930-1939
Info created by Russell Lee - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Original title retained, since the word Negro was a lot more respectful in 1939, not starting to go out of favour until the late 1950s, and "Colored" is really unavoidable given the subject. I'm not sure that Wikipedia can unilaterally change the title of an artistic work where the original is hosted elsewhere, so think we're stuck with it unless the Library of Congress changes it. In any case, let's not use such terms outside of appropriate historical/cultural contexts because everyone should feel welcome here. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Could we please NOT use the original titels as titles for the image on Commons? It is a bit of a shock to come across it like this. If you gave the image a different title (something like "Historical image of Black person during the time of segregation by Russell Lee", you could then give the original title in the description. This would help many people, because they would be prepared for the use of discriminatory terms in that context. --Kritzolina (talk) 09:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Technically, it's not a discriminatory term for the time; it is now though. Not sure how best to treat that. Like, of it was the N-word proper, then obviously shouldn't be in the filename, but... Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:40, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Adam says it is not cropped, but the missing bits of the crucial sign are a great shame. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Alamy, who are never opposed to selling public domain works at a high markup, have a copy which crops the left sign, which does not seem a good solution Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Historically significant. --Yann (talk) 18:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Yann. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:12, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:34, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:26, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 10:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't have a problem using the original title, providing it is in fact the title and not just someone's description. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:20, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They usually put a "Title designed by library staff" or put it in brackets if it's modern. This one appears to be the one from the catalogue they were given with it. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 10:43, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 20:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:49, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1930-1939

File:Colobo rojo de Zanzíbar (Piliocolobus kirkii), parque nacional de la Bahía Jozani Chwaka, Zanzíbar, Tanzania, 2024-06-02, DD 17.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2024 at 20:54:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Cercopithecidae_(Old_World_Monkeys)
Info Zanzibar red colobus (Piliocolobus kirkii), Jozani Chwaka Bay National Park, Zanzibar, Tanzania. This species of red colobus monkey is endemic to Unguja, the main island of the Zanzibar Archipelago, off the coast of Tanzania. It is now classified as an endangered species and in the mid-1990s was adopted as the flagship species for conservation in Zanzibar but the population is still decreasing. Note: we have no FPs of the genus Piliocolobus. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Well exposed, great detail. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:59, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 03:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition and exposure. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:16, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Needsmoreritalin. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 08:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:27, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful posture and composition. – Aristeas (talk) 09:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:45, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above, and let me add: Well captured in his environment. --Terragio67 (talk) 17:47, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 21:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:43, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Luc Viatour (talk) 14:14, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Cercopithecidae_(Old_World_Monkeys)

File:La Promenade, by Pierre-Auguste Renoir.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2024 at 18:50:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Duos (depictions of two people)
Info created by Pierre-Auguste Renoir, digitized by Getty Center, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support Famous painting, digitized by a renowned institution, high resolution. -- Yann (talk) 18:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 19:20, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:59, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 10:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:49, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 21:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:40, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Luc Viatour (talk) 14:15, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:24, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/People#Duos (depictions of two people)

File:Machado de Assis by Marc Ferrez.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2024 at 21:22:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1890-1899
Info created by Marc Ferrez - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Non destructive restoration, well done --Wilfredor (talk) 21:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good job! ★ 21:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Request to Adam Cuerden: can you restore this image? It will be my next nomination. ★ 22:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~...I did. Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]
Oh, there's a link there. Thought you were talking about THIS image, as in, the one nominated. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes! I just found it amazing! ★ 13:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 10:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just one more support… 🤞 ★ 12:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:09, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amanhecer em Guarapari - 1 edit.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 04:37:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Sun
Info A second try. Yes, I was in a rush and didn't wait for other users' opinions. Wow factor overshadows quality issues, in my opinion. Created and initially uploaded by Thales Augusto dos Santos - cropped by Poco a poco - nominated by ★ -- ★ 04:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 04:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not the best quality, as the sunset could be more appealing. I'd also add that the image is not special and that the boat could be more centered. Wolverine XI 18:44, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment "Wow factor overshadows quality issues, in my opinion" – It's nice but I don't see much wow here, compared to this recent upload of an evening (?) sky, for example. 80.129.250.195 18:13, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 20:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is borderline, lacks wow. Not close to images in the FP gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 05:40, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 12:14, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NSFWTAG

File:Undressing 5 - Photo by Giovanni Dall'Orto, August 8 2014.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2024 at 16:46:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#People
Info created and uploaded by G.dallorto - nominated by ★ -- ★ 16:46, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better pose. Nice light. Good-looking body. Black and white technique fits so well with the nude photography aesthetic idea. Why not? -- ★ 16:46, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The garment covers the face, the image is cringe-worthy, and the vignetting is unpleasant. Wolverine XI 19:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why is it embarrassing? ★ 21:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the lack of participation should answer your query. Wolverine XI 16:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I find no value in this photo, and the aesthetics are questionable.Luc Viatour (talk) 10:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 12:14, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Main Pavilion VDNKh in 2022.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 20:42:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
Info created by Artur Random - uploaded by Artur Random - nominated by Artur Random -- Artur Random (talk) 20:42, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Artur Random (talk) 20:42, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Many problems. The first ones are probably Underexposed and perspective distortion. You should visit COM:QIC -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:37, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is an FP of the same building, just for comparison. Sorry --A.Savin 02:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Not even QI. Please read the rules, and submit your files to COM:QI first. Yann (talk) 09:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Main Building of MSU in 2024.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 20:41:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
Info created by Artur Random - uploaded by Artur Random - nominated by Artur Random -- Artur Random (talk) 20:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Artur Random (talk) 20:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Many problems. The first one is probably Underexposed. You should visit COM:QIC -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is an FP of the same building, just for comparison. Sorry --A.Savin 02:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Not even QI. Please read the rules, and submit your files to COM:QI first. Yann (talk) 09:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Dromoique du désert BouHedma NP.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 12:36:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Scotocercidae
Info No FPs of this species. Created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:09, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:47, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great feather detail --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 18:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:44, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:22, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:26, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /– Aristeas (talk) 15:55, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Scotocercidae

File:YuanEmperorAlbumGenghisPortrait.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2024 at 13:23:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
Info created by unknown 14th-century painter - uploaded by Kcx36 - nominated by AirshipJungleman29 13:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of high historic merit—the most used depiction of Genghis Khan, probably notable in its own right. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Could be better, just saying. 20 upper 13:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valid vote?

"You can do better" opposing is a invalid argument, according to the guidelines. ★ 04:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What are you trying to start? Unless you point to me this "guideline", I will not put up with your nonsense. Wolverine XI 12:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates#Voting. ★ 12:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I see it, but there was no reason to strike my comment without my consent. I'm not a newcomer and I don't appreciate disrespect. I was expecting more from you. Wolverine XI 13:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the same comment, either. Before pulling your weight around, kindly double-check, since English is not your mother tongue. Wolverine XI 13:23, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your reason for opposing is invalid. That's the point. ★ 13:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't push my buttons, and apologize for striking my comment. Wolverine XI 15:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. ★ 03:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How so Wolverine XI? AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

?? Could be better, maybe could be Picture of the Year? :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support High level of detail, good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:58, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. We can see the texture of the silk in all detail and every brush stroke. – Aristeas (talk) 18:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 01:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 17:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 20:09, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 unclear oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:14, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/People#Paintings

Comment Closing with unclear result, because similar votes have been refused in the past. The vote crossed out without notification was unfair, but the absence of explanation given to the nominator AirshipJungleman29 is another problem. Maybe a further discussion is needed. In any case, the FP is promoted -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in favor of adding the rule: "any and all oppose vote must have a reason consistent with the aforementioned guidelines". @Wolverine XI: calm your nerves and join this discussion too. ★ 04:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rembrandt Harmensz van Rijn - Return of the Prodigal Son - Google Art Project.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 16:46:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity
Info Rembrandt, The Return of the Prodigal Son - uploaded by Dcoetzee - nominated by Thi
Support -- Thi (talk) 16:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I tried to open the file with the browser, but the result was unpity at the highest resolution. Using instead the "large-image-viewer", I was astonished by the details. Really a great job. --Harlock81 (talk) 17:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Typical super quality of the Google Art project. Viewing the overwhelming amount of detail with the zoom viewer works without any problems. Even the finest hairline crack is clearly visible. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:06, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:48, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Harlock81 and Radomianin. --Terragio67 (talk) 17:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 21:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:46, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Luc Viatour (talk) 14:13, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:25, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:38, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity

File:Saint-Petersburg. Bolsheokhtinsky Bridge (Peter the Great Bridge). Rivets on the bridge support.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 21:31:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Others
Info Rivets on the bridge support in St. Petersburg – created and uploaded by Александр Байдуков - nominated by Augustgeyler -- August (talk) 21:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- August (talk) 21:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
chromatic aberration -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Augustgeyler, Александр Байдуков, ArionStar, and Basile Morin: This is a very nice FP candidate and it would be a pity if the nomination failed due to technical issues. In the JPG file, I have removed various chromatic aberrations, especially in the left part of the image. You are welcome to upload the file for an update or a derivative if you are satisfied with the result: Download link via SwissTransfer. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 06:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks to user Zzzs for the update by using the edited file. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:58, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. August (talk) 21:20, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good spoting.--Mile (talk) 08:48, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exemplary use of the diagonal method as a compositional choice; pleasant color contrast, good technical quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:58, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I fell in love with this image 3 years ago and I'm still in love with it. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 20:17, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and Mile. – Aristeas (talk) 09:11, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:49, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This bridge have always fascinated me and here's rather unusual view of it. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 11:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:40, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The shadows create a very cool pattern with the rivets. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 10:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural_elements#Others

File:20240727 Kaplaneikirche Breitenau NZ92308.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2024 at 13:45:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Austria
Info Kaplaneikirche Breitenau/Molln, Lower Austria created by Granada - uploaded by Granada - nominated by Granada -- Granada (talk) 13:45, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral as Author -- Granada (talk) 13:45, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral as average light and architecture -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Subject is too tight in the frame.Luc Viatour (talk) 10:10, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Granada (talk) 12:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:(Castre) Notre-Dame-de-la-Platé - L'orgue de tribune.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2024 at 11:24:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Musical instruments
Info created & uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 11:24, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:24, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks to Tomer T for this nomination. The instrument is very beautiful to look at but it also has amazing acoustics.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 15:43, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:25, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tmv (talk) 00:18, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:47, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 21:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The tilted upwards point of view is leading to perspective distortion. It might be intentional, or could be seen as wanted perspective impression. But therefore the angle is to small. The angle is somewhere between intense perspective and just leaning verticals. So I think it spoils the composition. --August (talk) 10:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree the verticals could be fixed in this case. Also, I find the lonely piece of pillar + bit of light on the right distracting. It makes the composition random -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 18:26, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Musical instruments

File:Water reflection of Hyangwonjeong Pavilion at Gyeongbokgung Palace in Seoul.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2024 at 06:37:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The building is leaning to the left a bit. May be it's because it's very old. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 00:18, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. But I think the building is not completely vertical, you can compare here. According to this Korean website: "The pavilion was leaning to one side", it was therefore disassembled and restored. It is estimated to have been built in the late 1860s. Thank you -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Merci pour les explications. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 06:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:31, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support! --Terragio67 (talk) 21:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 21:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:45, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:21, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 06:12, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:46, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 18:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#South Korea

File:Búfalo cafre (Syncerus caffer), parque nacional de Tarangire, Tanzania, 2024-05-24, DD 31.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 20:08:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
Info African buffalo (Syncerus caffer), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. The African buffalo is one of the "big five" African game and is widely regarded as a very dangerous animal. Its shoulder height can range from 1.0 to 1.7 metres (3.3 to 5.6 ft) and its head-and-body length can range from 1.7 to 3.4 metres (5.6 to 11.2 ft) and it can weigh 425 to 870 kilograms (937 to 1,918 lb) (males weigh about 100 kilograms (220 lb) more than females). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: would support if shadows are brightened somewhat --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The Cosmonautː Done Poco a poco (talk) 21:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - Much better, Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharp where it needs to be, nice colors too. Glad all of the flies are out of focus. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 02:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The pose is not unusual, the sharpness is below par. The flies are an important element. The existing FP of Cape buffalo is better. --Tagooty (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:21, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination I believe that this is going nowhere, I take it back, thank you for your feedback. Poco a poco (talk) 17:18, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 17:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Disabled man observing, Montreal, Canada.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2024 at 18:42:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
Info I wanted to show in this photo how, despite the passage of time, our minds remain young. All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 18:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cringe. Wolverine XI 19:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why mate? Wilfredor (talk) 22:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know man, there may be kids around. But to answer your question, it may be that the subject of this photo is very awkward or just straight up embarrassing to talk about or even look at. I also don't think the female contributors would appreciate this. Wolverine XI 16:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking the time to respond. I hope that the image has not generated any unpleasant sensations in you. Show that even with our age and disabilities, our minds remain young. Wilfredor (talk) 16:53, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To start, I had no sensations at all. I get the message you are attempting to convey, but is it one that people find acceptable? In case my purplish-pink signature misled you into thinking I'm a woman, I'm not.Wolverine XI 19:43, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No matter if you're a woman, man, or any non-binary gender, everyone deserves equal treatment. I never assumed you were a woman, Wolverine is actually a very macho name, but if you are, it doesn't change anything. Once, I found out that someone I thought was a man was actually a woman. Since then, I've been more mindful of certain topics because I understand that Commons can be a tough place for women due to their small numbers. Wilfredor (talk) 20:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I want to be quite clear: I am a male (XY chromosomes), not a woman or any other gender. Also, I believe that these kinds of nominations will make any female contributor turn tail and skedaddle outta here. Now that I think about it, if pictures like these are being nominated, I don't blame women for not participating. Wilfredor, I understand your good intentions, but this picture is cringe. One female I know called this image a blatant example of sexual objectification and the so called "male gaze". I can't say I disagree with her, so... Wolverine XI 16:17, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If you think it's photos like this that keeps most women away from FPC, you are dead wrong. It's the overall toxic man-cave atmosphere at FPC that keeps most women as well as many decent male photographers away. All people have desires, dreams and urges, and if they are depicted in a good and respectful way in a photo they can certainly be promoted here. This photo however has composition problems. If it had been taken a few seconds later with a smaller F-number, then the woman would have been smaller in frame, more dreamlike (blurred) and the man would have been the main subject — just another old lonely man with dreams of a woman. Now the woman is too close to the frame and the thing that is most noticeable, is her butt and not the old man. That is what makes this photo sub-standard and not something I would support. --Cart (talk) 14:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks dear Cart, based on your perspective and comments, I want to express my admiration for your strength and for highlighting the importance of having women among us. Personally, I openly support women's inclusion and would like to encourage more to join us. I apologize for my past behavior towards you. I am genuinely tired of male supremacy, which is not just a problem here but a societal issue. This photo also makes me uncomfortable, and seeing it from your viewpoint, it's a critique of our society that mistreats women and perpetuates sexist stereotypes. Long live freedom, equality, and down with the imperialist patriarchal system!! Wilfredor (talk) 14:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Calling FAC a "toxic man-cave" is amusing, and I don't see how that will alleviate the problem. I also don't think that this is the appropriate forum for discussing political issues, so we just have to accept the status quo. Wolverine XI 16:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I'm not going to start some revolution, I know that is impossible, so your status quo is safe. I only thought that rather than you guessing why women aren't attracted to FPC, it might be ok for a woman to give a reason. --Cart (talk) 17:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I might have overreacted Wilfredor (talk) 17:52, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well it is – denialism isn't going to solve anything, Wolverine XI. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:17, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I'm denying anything, but how are men toxic on FPC? I fail to see it. Is it that there are more guys than girls? Beyond the reasons I described above, I don't see any other explanation for women's lack of participation. Wolverine XI 14:37, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you could start with not calling the women here "girls". I don't call the guys here "boys" since I think that would be equally demeaning to you men. The language flying around here is overly harsh and blind to that people are addressing other human beings. Adding to that, there is the rather competitive tone in comments. This forum used to be more about helping each other and the Commons project. Issues were solved with discussions rather than the heated confrontations we see today. This was some years ago when there were more women and skilled male photographers participating here. The "man cave" part is because the technical side of photography, and the race to get hold of the best and latest gadgets, now weighs heavier than composition and story. This is because it's easier for non-photographers to evaluate some rouge pixels than a bad compo. It makes for a lot of exclusion and inadvertently hard condescending comments. Also, try to be open to new subjects and trends in photography and not automatically sneer at something that is unfamiliar. However much some users here argue that choosing subjects and point of view is more down to individuals, the way you see the world and compose photos is very much a product of your gender and background. Nominating something new here and you basically get the same reactions the first Impressionist painters got at the Paris Salon more than a century ago.

I have written similar things many times before, but since you are relatively new here, you haven't seen them. (Apologies to the rest for repeating myself) Like before, this post too will be ignored and forgotten within a day or so and FPC will return to what it is now. Nothing will change. --Cart (talk) 15:39, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 I've been on a bit of a break from FPC for a few days now, but this nomination was still on my watch because I was afraid it might lead to some heated discourse. I frankly agree with Cart's statement because she is right. I wish there was more constructive help, especially for newbies or rare nominators. Fortunately, there are a few users who share their image editing experience in a tangible and concrete way with users who need help, in the sense of live and let live. This should be the norm rather than the exception. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+2 Thank you, Cart. It's always good to hear from you; you truly are an inspiración, not only for your work but also on a personal level. Our users come from many different places, making this a multicultural space where misunderstandings often occur. Photography is not just about técnica; it is an expression of each individual's experience, and to capture that diversidad, we need an inclusive and respectful environment, especially towards women. We live in a sociedad where women have had to fight hard for their derechos and for a place in spaces traditionally dominated by men, and FPC is no exception. If we genuinely want this to be a space where creatividad and colaboración flourish as you mentioned it used to be, we must strive to break down the barriers that limit female participation in FPC. I don't know how it is in other culturas, but in Brazil, women bring sensibilidades that can only come from them. We cannot afford to lose these valuable contributions due to a macho culture or the ego-stroking of testosterone-filled men, which can make this community seem exclusionary or dismissive. Another thing, the nivel of the entire community. I perceive this difference you mentioned, and it is evident to me at least, that this section is becoming increasingly problemática and tóxica. Many are no longer participating for this reason. This ambiente must be a place where everyone and not just by not being sexist; we must be actively inclusive. We must listen, learn, and change our practices because we are fostering the same issues seen on Wikipedia—a white European version of FPC. We all benefit from a more inclusive comunidad. Thank you for your coraje in writing this here, despite the likely opposition to these topics. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:05, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+3 I have also took a bit of a break from FPC, QIC and just Commons outside of FR for this very same reason. I wish I could say there's a solution to this, but I'm afraid we can't exactly do much as individuals other than call out misogyny and toxic behaviour when we see it. SHB2000 (talk) 02:17, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: provocative, but in a good way, I think --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

withdraw. I have withdrawn this nomination, but I leave this active so that the bot does not archive the discussion and we can better address this issue that I find important. --Wilfredor (talk) 18:37, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nice piece of art. --August (talk) 20:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:27, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nest box “Birdies Welcome”, Chico, 2024-03-12.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 04:55:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
Info A decorative golf-themed nest box on a wooden fence on West Sacramento Avenue in Chico, California. Maybe the gallery …/Objects#Others would be more appropriate than …/Objects#Containers, I'm a bit unsure and would appreciate any suggestions. Thank you very much. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 04:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is not a bird that has nested there, but a spider :) I like how the crooked birdhouse contrasts with the wooden fence. It's the mixed fascination between the beautifully designed main motif and the traces of natural slow decay. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The other nest boxes are at '.../Objects#Other objects in landscapes' so I would recommend that section. Btw, for all the other non-golfers here: A "birdie" is a common golf word and something that most players would like to achieve, hence the pun. ;-) --Cart (talk) 09:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the gallery suggestion and the insight into the world of golf, Cart :) I have updated the gallery accordingly. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Containers store inanimate things, not living animals. ★ 21:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Special photo. Well taken with an eye for colours and the proportions are perfect in my opinion..--Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Funny. The contrasting selected colours (gray background, green nest box, red golf flag) and the distinct pattern of the aged wood background make it beautiful to me. – Aristeas (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:14, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 00:27, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:01, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:26, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Other objects in landscapes

File:96 Grand Rue in Turckheim (1).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 10:42:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral A more impressive sky could give a plus in the wow factor. ★ 13:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like this. Colors, ambient. ★ if you think sunny, you can get ugly shadows on one side. I would even more scarry darker weather. --Mile (talk) 15:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yep! A good argument! ★ 15:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per Mile.The colors are special to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 15:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:29, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support El Golli Mohamed 22:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 17:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Was there perspective correction applied afterwards? --August (talk) 04:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose Very nice scene, with very good and inviting colours. But I am not happy with the upwards tilted camera angle. It looks as if the camera was tilted up just too much, resulting in necessary PC, some distortion and a bit too much sky in the composition. --August (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:50, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Mile. Nice atmosphere. – Aristeas (talk) 15:52, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France

File:Black swordtail (Graphium colonna) Maputo.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 16:10:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
Info An unusual PoV only made possible with focus-stacking. Only image of this species of swallowtail on Commons. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but this side perspective isn't working as it should. Wolverine XI 18:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain a little more, please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you respond please Wolverine XI? Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The unsettling thing about this viewpoint, in my opinion, is that the proboscis of the butterfly is hidden from view. I am also unable to discern the body shape, colouration of the ventral side and underwing. I can only make out the head, back, left wing, and tail. In other words, I would really like to see more of the body than just the wings. Still, the details are excellent. Wolverine XI 13:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lastly, where are the six jointed legs? Wolverine XI 13:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yes a very unusual perspective, but very interesting. -- -donald- (talk) 07:19, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There are very few butterfly profile images, it's a very interesting angle. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support LGTM --Zzzs (talk) 17:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 10:01, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:39, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)

File:Rufa red knot (Calidris canutus rufa) in Delaware Bay, New Jersey.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2024 at 18:03:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Calidris
Info created by Needsmoreritalin - uploaded by Needsmoreritalin - nominated by User:Needsmoreritalin -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 18:03, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 18:03, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 20:27, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 20:45, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 21:51, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking colours and clarity. --Tagooty (talk) 05:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:51, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 08:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Crazy that the bird is giving you them side eyes. Wolverine XI 17:07, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It has an RBF. Resting Bird Face. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The sharpening is a bit overdone, but it's still a very good photo Luc Viatour (talk) 10:01, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:19, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:46, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile and Tagooty. – Aristeas (talk) 16:03, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:19, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:48, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Calidris

File:Saint Vincent church of Blois 03.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 10:51:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharpness and light overshadow symmetry. ★ 13:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Definitely not symmetrical, as the left side takes more space than the right. Wolverine XI 18:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A better solution than to cut the pulpit --Llez (talk) 15:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Wolve. I suggested another crop for a more intentional un-centred composition, which I would support. --August (talk) 21:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment My opinion is it would be better to include as much space to the right as to the left. The fact that the interior furniture is asymmetric does not affect the symmetrical architecture. The current choice of framing is a bit weird -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The color balance could be improved, and the framing is off-center.Luc Viatour (talk) 10:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:39, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frozen Lake Shinko La Lahaul Jun24 A7CR 00315.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 04:57:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info Frozen lake at Shinko La, elev. 5,091 m (16,703 ft). Peaks towards Darcha elev. 5,500–6,100 m (18,000–20,000 ft). Lahaul, Himachal, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:57, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:57, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:39, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:52, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Snow in India? ★ 13:16, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, Himalayas means abode of snow. The mountains around this 16,560' pass are snow-covered year round. Tagooty (talk) 16:15, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:47, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:14, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:13, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An essential image: white snow, black rocks, the light blue of the lake and the dark blue of the sky. – Aristeas (talk) 16:07, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A blue composition. --August (talk) 20:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:15, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 05:46, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:50, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:06, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:41, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:07, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#India

File:Жало шершня.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 22:16:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Vespidae (Hornets, Paper Wasps, Potter Wasps, and Yellowjackets)
Info European hornet sting under a microscope / Created by Alexander Klepnev - uploaded by Alexander Klepnev - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 22:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 22:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Main categories missing. The white halo is very distracting -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Categories added. JukoFF (talk) 19:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:31, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the halo. It takes time but is fixable manually -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Even as it is with the halo the image remains remarkable and exceptional. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Useful. --Thi (talk) 10:00, 2 August 2024 (UTC)s[reply]
Weak support This halo isn't a result of overprocessing, but how the cut have appeared under the microscope IMO. And with that I vote for difficulty of making this photo over the quality (that is also not as bad as it can be). Красный ^{wanna talk?} 13:18, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:45, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Vespidae (Hornets, Paper Wasps, Potter Wasps, and Yellowjackets)

File:Parque Nacional das Emas Thiago Franco -1.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 15:32:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ramphastidae (Toucans)
Info created and uploaded by Tfranco72 - nominated by ★ -- ★ 15:32, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 15:32, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cute bird, but the shot is out of focus. I can see very sharp feather lines behind the neck (see my note), but everything else is soft. Typical back focus, unfortunately -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:59, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 16:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canal houses and Oude Kerk at blue hour with water reflection in Damrak Amsterdam Netherlands.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 01:29:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Netherlands
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exceptional lighting and reflections. --Tagooty (talk) 05:33, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:53, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:40, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:13, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking lights. ★ 13:19, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:28, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:48, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:14, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:46, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tagooty. – Aristeas (talk) 16:04, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:19, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support +1. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:16, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 05:47, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:49, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:40, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Netherlands

File:Meduse-Chrysaora hysoscella-Nausicaa-07-2024-Luc-Viatour.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 07:34:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Scyphozoa
Info created by Lviatour - uploaded by Lviatour - nominated by Lviatour -- Luc Viatour (talk) 07:34, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 07:34, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Красный ^{wanna talk?} 09:53, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 13:19, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great to see that you're still active! --Zzzs (talk) 16:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
on vacation and have some time to post ;) Luc Viatour (talk) 17:55, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality ahah --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:15, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:45, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The attention to detail is immaculately, other worldly good! Wolverine XI 19:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:53, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high level of detail for an underwater picture -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour's triumphant return! ★ 13:16, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 06:10, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:14, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 09:34, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great. @Lviatour: But please do not add your FP candidates to the FP gallery pages. I had to revert your change, sorry. When the image gets promoted to FP status, our bot will add the image automatically to the gallery page. Users normally do not need (and should not) add any images manually to the FP gallery pages. Thank you, – Aristeas (talk) 16:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:50, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 23:03, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:41, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:29, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class : Scyphozoa

File:M31-Andromede-16-09-2023-Hamois.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 13:56:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Galaxies
Info created by Lviatour - uploaded by Lviatour - nominated by ~~Lviatour~~ George Chernilevsky -- Luc Viatour (talk) 13:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC) updated nominator, per discussion below -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 13:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Incroyable! --Wilfredor (talk) 18:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Only two active nominations per author are allowed. Let this is my nomination, I give my limit here. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think we can make an exception to welcome him back after so many years of inactivity. Wilfredor (talk) 20:34, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, it's great to be able to post again after such a long time! Luc Viatour (talk) 21:10, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Nominator updated, to avoid {{FPD}}. The rules for withdrawal, alternatives or else also apply to the new nominator -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- as new Nominator --George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:42, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support! --Terragio67 (talk) 19:22, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would have thought this was by Hubble. --Yann (talk) 19:58, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:16, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support You can nominate only two photos in the same time. You are welcome here :) El Golli Mohamed 21:52, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really disappointed there isn't EXIF data here! ;) This one really brings focusing to infinity to a new level. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:38, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not possible to provide EXIF data for this type of image. It's a composite of 144 FIT 16-bit 45MP photos, captured using a Nikon Z8 with a 640mm F5.4 lens and stitched together in the open-source software Siril. I've included the specific shooting details in the image description. Luc Viatour (talk) 06:26, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I know, I left a wink. Its an amazing image. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:30, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support If only the visible colour version was featured. --Zzzs (talk) 01:02, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand, my photo is in color, the link provided is a photo of another person. Luc Viatour (talk) 06:38, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not that your image doesn't meet FP standards. I mean that the visible coloured image of the same galaxy should also be featured, but I'm worried that the amount of photos of said galaxy as well as it's colour might reduce its chance of being a FP. There's nothing wrong with your photo. Zzzs (talk) 15:03, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
👽 Hello there :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 03:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Painterly. ★ 13:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Your work? not bad... :) and welcome back! Poco a poco (talk) 06:43, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:17, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some coma on bright stars in the corners, but still excellent. Thanks to Zzzs for fixing the premature addition to the gallery page. Aristeas (talk) 16:27, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:52, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:42, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 03:12, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Galaxies

File:Lucie Delarue-Mardrus by Henri Manuel.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 20:26:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1920-1929
Info created by Henri Manuel, restored and uploaded by Adam Cuerden, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 20:26, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautifull --Wilfredor (talk) 20:33, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:38, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support and thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:45, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 09:55, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:10, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:29, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:18, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:29, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:53, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:38, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:42, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 03:11, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical/People#1920-1929

File:Fauvette pitchou Ichkeul NP.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 13:06:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sylviidae (Sylviid Warblers)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support btw, excellent lens and camera combination --Wilfredor (talk) 13:18, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support great Luc Viatour (talk) 14:11, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:44, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support! --Terragio67 (talk) 19:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:39, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:27, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tunisia being well-represented with El Golli Mohamed. ★ 13:12, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support What ★ said! --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:07, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 06:10, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 13:10, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:17, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 05:45, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:51, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:05, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:41, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:47, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 03:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sylviidae (Sylviid Warblers)

File:04--Martin-Pecheur-20-01-24-Halois-Belgium-Luc viatour.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 13:45:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
Info created by Lviatour - uploaded by Lviatour - nominated by Lviatour -- Luc Viatour (talk) 13:45, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 13:45, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Incredible colors. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:12, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 17:55, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 18:26, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:44, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support! --Terragio67 (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poor bird rethinking his whole life. Wolverine XI 19:51, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:54, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:27, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High resolution, eye in focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great feather detail, you can see a lot ion the reflection in the Kingfisher's eye too. Evenly exposed, low noise. Awesome. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light! ★ 13:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August (talk) 14:33, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:06, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 06:09, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:44, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Good, nice colors ~~but you have strong CA on bottom part of wood~~. --Mile (talk) 09:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're absolutely right, it's very obvious. I've fixed the image. specially since there is a function to automatically remove chromatic aberrations in the open-source software Darktable.Luc Viatour (talk) 12:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Good work. --Mile (talk) 17:22, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. -- -donald- (talk) 10:50, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 12:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. @Lviatour: Premature addition to the gallery page reverted. Please see the comment in the other nomination. – Aristeas (talk) 16:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 05:45, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:52, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:42, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:47, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 01:10, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 28 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 03:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)

File:Caldeiras das Furnas 2023-02-25.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 01:36:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: Furnas hot springs, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A clear overview. --Thi (talk) 09:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 20:49, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:45, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:27, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Perhaps it would be useful to add some more information to the photo. At first I had no idea what I was looking at.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:00, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 21:21, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:10, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Portugal

File:Golden-Fronted Woodpecker Nest.png, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2024 at 03:59:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Picidae_(Woodpeckers)
Info created by Needsmoreritalin - uploaded by Needsmoreritalin - nominated by Needsmoreritalin -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 03:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 03:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:01, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:30, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit too dark but very detailed: Luc Viatour (talk) 09:42, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:03, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:30, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic hiding, great sharpness -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:37, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Fine but it looks underexposed Poco a poco (talk) 06:38, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support But it is shadow shot, i think OK. Good quality. --Mile (talk) 09:24, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Similar, but not exact --Zzzs (talk) 13:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nice! Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:13, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm surprised you're the only person who understood the reference. -- Zzzs (talk) 03:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Popeye, right? When he uses the woodpecker's tree as a mast? Needsmoreritalin (talk) 20:06, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes! Zzzs (talk) 20:29, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Lviatour. – @Needsmoreritalin: Please remove the hint “For non-commercial use only.” from the description page: The CC BY-SA license (and Commons licensing policy in general) allows also commercial use, sorry. (You can keep the hint “Must use attribution as follows "Chuck Homler / FocusOnWildlife.ME"”, of course – people often struggle to attribute images correctly and such hints can help them.) – Aristeas (talk) 16:34, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed! Thank you. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent --Wilfredor (talk) 18:18, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 19:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:56, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:43, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Picidae_(Woodpeckers)

File:Agave field in Jalisco, Mexico.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 23:51:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Asparagaceae
Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:51, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:51, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:20, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Something different. --Yann (talk) 09:31, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Naturally edited. ★ 13:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:58, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:29, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool pattern, the contrast of the iron rich soil and the agave can be appreciated from this angle. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:45, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:39, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 09:25, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 13:10, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Needsmoreritalin. – Aristeas (talk) 16:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:37, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 05:45, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:55, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:39, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:43, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:47, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:40, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Asparagaceae

File:Sainte Chapelle Interior Stained Glass.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2024 at 12:20:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#France
Info created and uploaded by Oldmanisold - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:20, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 12:20, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question No wow? ★ 12:36, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 15:32, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Катон-Карагай птица Варакушка крупный план.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 06:56:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)
Info created and uploaded by Ivan Gorgulenko - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 06:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 06:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment No need for a half-bird. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think this photo deserves a little bit more discussion. Perspective, focus and crop are certainly unusual. But people often consider the colourful throat as the most interesting feature of this species, and therefore it makes some sense that the photo emphasizes the throat and shows it in all its beauty. – Aristeas (talk) 09:09, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment More discussion, then, though I know Aristeas does not welcome my critiques. Apologies to the photographer for going into more detail: The composition is unnatural, awkward and unbalanced. The point of view is well below the bird which is surprising considering a 600mm lens was used. The foreground bush is distracting, as is the blurred tail. The chest feathers are nicely in focus but the eye and top of the head are not. The choice of lens means that even with F8 the depth of field is poor. So 3/10 for artistic impression and 3/10 for technical merit. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Charles, I appreciate your critiques, especially when they are clear and detailed as this one. When I emphasize the strenghs of a photo which has been criticized by you (or anybody else), I do not do this because I want to contradict you, but because IMHO photos deserve a good discussion which considers both the merits and the vices of each image. This a good way to encourage others to examine the image in detail for themselves, and ultimately to arrive together at a balanced judgment in a lively exchange of opinions. -- Aristeas (talk) 18:59, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Aristeas. --Thi (talk) 09:53, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 21:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Problem of focus and depth of field. Eye and top of the head are out of focus. The whole body lacks detail. Also the unappealing blurry tail. In addition to the feet missing, the distracting foreground makes the composition cluttered -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:22, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above, detail level in some areas is though nice, but the eyes are critical Poco a poco (talk) 06:50, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 22:38, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Alessandro Augusto Alves Pinto (05).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2024 at 12:20:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by Alessandro Augusto - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:20, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 12:20, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:56, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The lighting and the mist certainly create a "wow" factor. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:15, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:57, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Needsmoreritalin. – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:31, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Wilfredor (talk) 18:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:38, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Brazil

File:León (Panthera leo), parque nacional de Tarangire, Tanzania, 2024-05-24, DD 99.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2024 at 20:55:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Felidae_(Felids)
Info Lion (Panthera leo) resting on a tree in Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 05:55, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could support if you remove CA, which is above the fur. On left side you see more green, more to right goes pink, also on tree on right side lion is sitting (green CA). Solvable. Quality/Compo is fine, especialy eyesight. --Mile (talk) 09:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mile: I applied some defringe, please, bear in my that I'm offering a 45 MPx image. --Poco a poco (talk) 09:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support This was fast. Normaly i dont solve with defringe, unless you have correction just for that lens. --Mile (talk) 09:37, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can work with this, but the chroma noise on the subject needs to be removed. It's a simple fix, but I'm hesitant to make any changes because I don't know how to do it without editing the original file Luc Viatour (talk) 10:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Luc Viatour I couldn't se any chorma noise (esp. in the dark areas) but still uploaded a new version reducing it. Poco a poco (talk) 14:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Zzzs (talk) 13:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 16:49, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:54, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support aww, that photo just looks so adorable. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:15, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 05:44, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:24, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High resolution of a lion in a natural environment -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:03, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:45, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 06:09, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:37, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Felidae_(Felids)

File:Blick in den Nationalpark Berchtesgaden.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2024 at 15:52:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info View from the Berchtesgadener Hochthron southward to Watzmann and Hochkalter. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:52, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:52, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, great job. I'm just asking if, in your opinion, is it possible to dehaze the ~~fore~~background, especially the left-top part? Terragio67 (talk) 19:08, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I meant to suggest an alternative version, but accidentally corrected the original. I'm not sure how to undo that and propose the other option. Luc Viatour (talk) 21:10, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 21:07, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:41, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Since all votes except mine were cast after Luc's "accident", I'll leave it as it is for now. Comparisons with the original version are possible in the file history. The light may now appear a bit too harsh? But I like that too. --Milseburg (talk) 08:57, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the late reply, I agree completely with you. Support Terragio67 (talk) 14:18, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:58, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 11:12, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:41, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:45, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:25, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --Zzzs (talk) 21:24, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:37, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria

File:Bird photographer in El Guenine dam (Tunisia).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2024 at 16:44:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:44, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:44, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Is this photo you again? If this is the case I would abstain because even if it is a male photographer with a good body and well camouflaged, we should not support narcissism. --Wilfredor (talk) 18:17, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not me, but sorry, I didn't understand why "again"? have I posted photos of myself before? Thank you for the support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wilfredor, I think you might be confusing this with a photo of Giles. Wildlife photographers often use the same line of fashion. :) --Cart (talk) 19:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
True, I think I got confused because of the username which is similar. Sorry Wilfredor (talk) 19:28, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to point out that I didn't personnally nominate the ghillie suit picture and that this kind of comment is one of the reasons why I would probably never have nominated it myself. That being said, I see no problem with users nominating pictures of themselves, especially if it is a good and useful picture like the present candidate -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:57, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August (talk) 20:38, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 22:12, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great picture of a body of water and some vegetation, but umm, I don't see anything else. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:15, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:14, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:02, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 14:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:43, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:58, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:54, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:46, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:03, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Gnosis (talk) 18:23, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:58, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work

File:Leopard (Panthera pardus pardus) Kruger 3.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2024 at 16:53:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info On a big-five safari, one is on a vehicle so when the animals are close the PoV is poor. This shot of the leopard approaching required a good crop. That explains the smaller-than-usual resolution. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:45, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Isn't WB here is a bit off? Красный ^{wanna talk?} 18:47, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the shadows have been lifted too much -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question Where comes the blue light from? Was there a light source from the left? It looks nice but unnatural. --August (talk) 04:31, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly no light beam in this National Park -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:47, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Charles, ACR's colour mixer is often a good way to get rid of the blue cast on lifted shadows without messing up the white balance of the remaining image. Toning down the blue channel a few notches should do the trick. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for all the helpful comments. New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:13, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think both the subject and the background benefited from the new processing (less contrast and sharpening?), but isn't the blue colour cast stronger? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stronger now, yes, I agree -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:22, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Don't know. I reduced blue as you suggested! Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:45, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you reduced luminance instead of saturation? That would explain the stronger cast. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 13:55, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tried on the JPEG file, a -35 blue saturation gets rid of the cast. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:00, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Charles, I've uploaded a new version, what do you think? Julesvernex2 (talk) 16:31, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Colors on shadow side go to pink, in all colors dont convince me, crop-composition neither. --Mile (talk) 17:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder what I can do about this user Mile? On my last 10 (successful) FPCs, he has two other opposes this one, this one, 3 negative comments, 3 ignored, 0 positive votes (last few months). Is this a case for Commons User Problems? He has many current support votes (and no opposes) for others' wildlife images.Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:40, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesjsharp Keep counting. Isntead you could put more love to picture, mass upload wont help at quality. This one, i think all on that jeep had similar tourist shot. Pink/blue CA was visible on previous too. Solve them, or skip and try with "User problems". --Mile (talk) 08:45, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Last version is fine, in my opinion. Appealing front view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's fine now. Front view of leopard is rather appealing, agree with Basile. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 08:22, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree with Basile and Красный. Thanks to Julesvernex2 for your helpful hints! – Aristeas (talk) 18:43, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:20, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Lighting / WB / resulting colors but still a nice capture Poco a poco (talk) 06:47, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Per Poco a poco. But for me lighting, WB and colour weigh a bit more than the very nice, sharp and balanced composition. --August (talk) 16:24, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't look as if everyone likes your version @Julesvernex2: . Can you respond to their concerns please. It looks OK to me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure there's anything left to do, Charles. To my eyes white balance is now correct, but lighting and colours are what they are. I personally like the raking light and muted colours, but these things are subjective. Can't win them all! --Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Poco, but I think the WB can be corrected. --Zzzs (talk) 21:22, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)

File:Tanja Vienonen on cover of Eeva 1998 (JOKASEK5I09A-1).tif, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2024 at 10:07:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info Finnish model and politician Tanja Karpela in 1998 - created by Seppo Konstig - uploaded by FinnaUploadBot - nominated by Thi

* Support -- Thi (talk) 10:07, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would support a JPEG version. Yann (talk) 10:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 12:22, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support tiff is more for raw(or scans) and not for web. Please transform it in JPG using RGB --Wilfredor (talk) 18:44, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Converting master images (i.e., versions of what Wikimedia Commons uses as source images when scaling) from lossless images to lossy compression is a bad idea as it degrades the image quality. Also, Wikimedia Commons does a good enough transparent conversion from TIFF to JPEG on the fly that there is no need for manual conversions for general use just to get a JPEG version of the file. --Zache (talk) 23:16, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support A JPG version is a standard format that has the advantage of a low weigh. It is also easy to download, and to display in many softwares and browsers. You can choose the best conversion rate with minimum loss, almost insignificant. And the original TIFF remains available with a link in the image page -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:45, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose JPEG version is better for FP. Yann (talk) 17:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Support Normaly i dont touch film photos, i support both, here i added some light and remove red capilars in eye. --Mile (talk) 12:22, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Good execution. Thanks for the edit, Mile. I think the inversion of the vignetting as an improvised solution for the retouch is very successful in this case and fits harmoniously into the image. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:50, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support withdrawn Without doing a research before, I did not know that this is a historically important photograph with a bio. Therefore I withdraw my vote, although I believe a plain derivative would be permissible. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:55, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 20:40, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support withdrawn --Thi (talk) 21:39, 1 August 2024 (UTC) Comment The edited version is a good addition and I would like to support it, but it is too bright when compared to original. --Thi (talk) 09:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Original photo is here. It is a famous photograph, part of the "Finnish Heritage Agency". You can't change the appearance of a widespread cover of magazine Eeva, and pretend the author is the photographer Seppo Konstig with such a fancy effect as this white gradient all around. Many photographers don't like this nebulous, cloudy style, and it would be misleading to believe that the photographer chose this appearance for that portrait. You can modify the photos that belong to you as much as you want, but for the significant photos that are anchored in history, it seems essential to me to respect the original source, even if it is not to the taste of all the participants from Wikimedia in 2024. Imagine Che Guevara, or Louis Armstrong with a similar white cloud outline, it would be ridiculous to promote such a version. Okay for the original (unedited) in JPG only -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:19, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:29, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative 2

Support This is unedited JPG picture with the 1990s-style color saturation. [2] --Thi (talk) 09:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Conversion was fine in my opinion. No difference between both versions (TIF and JPG) in a sRGB environment. Excellent portrait -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Here in Browser WB is completely off. --August (talk) 10:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have uploaded better version. --Thi (talk) 11:21, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edit. Funnily enough, I just created an improved version too, with an embedded sRGB profile :) But your version has more vivid colors. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:43, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 17:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 20:48, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Gnosis (talk) 18:50, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

The chosen alternative is: File:Tanja Vienonen on cover of Eeva 1998 (JOKASEK5I09A-1).jpg

File:Fratercula arctica in flight, Borgarfjörður eystri, Iceland, 20240717 1136 1678.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2024 at 05:59:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Fratercula
Info Atlantic puffin approaches landing in a colony in Bakkagerði. All by me -- -- Jakubhal 05:59, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 05:59, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Nice quality, great capture of the moment. Wow! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:39, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:14, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 10:06, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 13:18, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great capture! --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 13:56, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! --August (talk) 16:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great El Golli Mohamed 19:07, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support very well --Wilfredor (talk) 19:29, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 22:11, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 05:43, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:29, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:01, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:41, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Actually he attacked you and you took it full in the head.. I hope he didn't break the camera... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:01, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:53, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support {{Strong support}} if the resolution had been higher. Fantastic action shot, very impressive view. Remake of The Birds? :-) Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:42, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:46, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Trougnouf (talk) 08:50, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 28 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Fratercula

File:Vruchten van Hertshooi (Hypericum). 27-07-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2024 at 04:11:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Hypericaceae
Info Swelling fruits ripening from a Hypericum Focus stack of 22 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:11, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:11, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 05:43, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hypericum androsaemum --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:57, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your information. I have adjusted the categories.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:08, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support ★ 16:43, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:41, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:47, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:58, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:29, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:26, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:31, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 19:11, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --Zzzs (talk) 21:25, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:36, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 11:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Hypericaceae

File:El Greco (Domenikos Theotokopoulos) - Laocoön - Google Art Project.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2024 at 22:02:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Nudes
Info El Greco: Laocoön - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by Thi
Support -- Thi (talk) 22:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ ★ 23:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why just the oppose? --SHB2000 (talk) 04:13, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See this discussion. ★ 10:58, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:14, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:03, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high quality reproduction Luc Viatour (talk) 12:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:39, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:27, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 11:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:56, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 17:32, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:26, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/People#Nudes

File:Morar Sunset (29311558676).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2024 at 12:13:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United_Kingdom
Info created by b3tarev3 on Flickr - uploaded by Advocate from Sandtown - nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:30, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:20, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:31, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:13, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alessandro Samaritani - Voice, Guitarist - Aironi bianchi - 2024-07-16 - GT 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2024 at 16:22:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
Info From the first moment, I was impressed by the professionalism of this pop singer. Although it is not known, he worked for 17 years for a cover band in Emilia-Romagna (Italy). Alessandro Samaritani, guitarist and singer, for a moment found himself with a good expressiveness in the center between the microphone and the rising moon. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:22, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:22, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 20:46, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blurred guitare and harsh lights on his face. In addition, I can't see anything extraordinary here. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:35, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 19:39, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:M019F001 Deckenlicht im Vulkan im Wörlitzer Park.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2024 at 16:18:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Glass_ceilings_and_skylights
Info Glass dome in the artificial volcano "Vesuvius" in the UNESCO World Heritage site "Wörlitzer Park" – created, uploaded and nominated by Augustgeyler -- August (talk) 16:18, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author. -- August (talk) 16:18, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:44, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Question: how close to original colors did you come with scan with DSLR. The other is you scaned developed film and checked colors with orignal picture ? Seems nice, but i miss more sharp, big aperture didnt help probably-f/2.8. Some (probably) mistake is annoted and one burnt pixel of left seide of cupola. --Mile (talk) 11:01, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reviewing so detailed. I try to respond step by step:
- Colours: I am always using reference slides with LUT for film digitalization. Here I used a Agfa Precisa CT 100 reference as colour table. So I can rule out any colour shift between slide and this image produced with my DSLR. Of course the film itself was making some shift compared to the real world in the first place. This file is looking very close to what the slide is looking like. And the image is very close to reality. You have to know that this room was built to have that kind of intense low light. I visited the "volcano" several times. And every time I am very impressed by this room. It is very dark in there. So for the first seconds you can not see any stone of that dome, just the very saturated yellow / orange glass. After a while the eyes adapt and the dome becomes visible.
- Sharpness: Yes it was partially intentional. I tried to focus on the glass, more than onto the dome. Additionally it is a compromise for exposure time, because the tripod was not installable as stable as one would wish to. The is a statue below, and the tripod has to stand one one foot to not touch the statue.
- The "strange black line" is a scratch at the film produced while processing. The "burnt pixel" is not a pixel but a film corn which somehow developed wrong. I will retouch both errors today.
August (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done August (talk) 15:45, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ August Got it. Looking at this, i think you could put cupola in upper third with some crop (as shown), what would i do, maybe as Alternative. Do you know what Dmax you have from this type of scan ? --Mile (talk) 08:50, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. It sounds like a good idea. I tried it in several ways. To get the maximum two thirds look out of it, I have to cut off very much content and can not win some new in the bright right part. This would waste too much detail of the still limited film information. I think the image just was not composed for that approach in the first place. August (talk) 09:04, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support True, i would be scared to crop film photo. Feeling some strange. So should cover best compo at begining and to further. Somehow plused. --Mile (talk) 09:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support This photo is a piece of art in many ways, not only because of the weather at that time and place, but also the technique used, the camera used, it is a look at the past and the present. I am really a big fan of your work. There is no way to compare the other nominations with this kind of photography. --Wilfredor (talk) 19:31, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:32, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition, and I really like how most of the dome (almost) disappears in the dark and only the lower left part is illuminated. – Aristeas (talk) 11:05, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:16, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:26, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:21, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:14, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 22:44, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural_elements#Glass_ceilings_and_skylights

File:Fomitopsis pinicola 2023 G1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 20:46:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Polyporaceae
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:46, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Red Banded Polypore (Fomitopsis pinicola) on a dead tree. Mushrooms changed direction of growth after tree fell.
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:46, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:20, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Useful image, and the sharpness is fine. Unfortunately the flash light is very harsh and creates strong contrasts. Sorry, I think a long exposure shot by using a tripod would have helped in this situation -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:54, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Basile, there are strong shadows Poco a poco (talk) 06:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:03, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:32, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:18, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:40, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 10:59, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family_:_Polyporaceae

File:Lac Roumassot (2).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 04:28:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Pyrénées-Atlantiques
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 04:28, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 04:28, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive scenery -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:11, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:32, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:41, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:08, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:23, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:00, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 19:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 21:26, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:46, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:09, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 21:38, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another clean shot. Wolverine XI 19:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 11:01, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Pyrénées-Atlantiques

File:P.L. Travers as Titania in a production with Alan Wilkie.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2024 at 19:48:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1920-1929
Info Unknown creator - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:48, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:48, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:00, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 19:08, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:46, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 13:23, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:01, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 03:40, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice pose and wonderful restoration! Wolverine XI 19:53, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 11:04, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical/People#1920-1929

File:Kühlungsborn, Vorplatz Seebrücke, Laternen -- 2024 -- 5147.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2024 at 19:09:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Lighting_devices
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 19:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 19:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow that's very appealing. I like the way the clear and sharp glass structure in the foreground is interacting with the very moody and blurry background. The bird is adding wonderfully to this composition. This image is telling a story about a nice evening at the sea and "Fernweh". --August (talk) 22:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Translucent glass spheres work very well with the contre-jour light. Although out of focus, the bird is nice and adds something to the atmosphere. The bit of bush at the lower left corner is more distracting in my view (because too small to be considered part of the composition). Overall warm and appealing -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful atmosphere. --Terragio67 (talk) 03:54, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 07:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:27, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:29, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice El Golli Mohamed 14:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:24, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:34, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:39, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:01, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This, however, is much better. Wolverine XI 19:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 11:05, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Lighting_devices

File:Intérieur de la basilique-cathédrale Notre-Dame de Québec 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 20:44:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Canada
Info All by Wilfredor (talk) 20:44, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 20:38, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:32, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:41, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 17:35, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 10:58, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Canada

File:Lac du Miey (5).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 04:29:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Pyrénées-Atlantiques
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 04:29, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 04:29, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appealing landscape -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:11, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:34, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:40, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:23, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:37, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
SupportLuc Viatour (talk) 19:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 21:28, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:46, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:37, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 17:25, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:29, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clean shot. Wolverine XI 19:37, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 11:03, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Pyrénées-Atlantiques

File:018 Lilac-breasted roller in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 03:33:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Coraciidae_(Rollers)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautifull bird --Wilfredor (talk) 03:39, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:49, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High resolution and harmonious colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:09, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 07:53, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great El Golli Mohamed 14:07, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:24, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:37, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice birdy. But may it be this is an immature bird (this, for instance, is presumably a picture of an adult Coracias caudatus specimen), in this case this should be also described as such. Also, of course, Category:Protected areas of Tanzania is clearly redundant, because: "Protected areas of Tanzania" -> "National parks of Tanzania" -> "Serengeti National Park" (-> "Animals of Serengeti National Park" -> "Birds of Serengeti National Park"), you should therefore remove it from all your uploaded picture of the same session, if there are more available. --A.Savin 17:43, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your comment. I'm not sure yet if it's a juvenile and I will do more research on it (I don't want to add a statement to the file without being sure of it), if it's the case I'll edit accordingly. As for the category "Protected areas of Tanzania", it is automatically added to all uploads made with the WLE in Tanzania 2024 upload wizard and may be needed or useful to the organizers. Therefore I would prefer to wait until the end of WLE 2024 in case this category is needed for the national or international jury depending how their scripts where made. Once WLE 2024 has ended, I'll happily remove that category that was automatically added. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:40, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
After checking it seems that it is an adult and not an immature one -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:16, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great lighting, excellent feather detail, with no distracting elements in the background. Wonderful image. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 18:55, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High resolution great Luc Viatour (talk) 19:07, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wonder if this could be VI... --Zzzs (talk) 21:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:07, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:09, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 17:26, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:41, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a bird; what a shot! Wolverine XI 19:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 11:06, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Coraciidae_(Rollers)

File:Panama canal panoramic.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 23:32:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other
Info -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm surprised that we don't have any featured pictures of the Panama Canal. ★ 13:07, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:27, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 10:59, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miradouro das Rocas 2023-03-13-1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2024 at 00:18:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: view from Miradouro das Rocas, Peneda-Gerês National Park; all by-- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Problem of light / white balance (the whole image seems hazy / blueish), and also stitching problem. It's very visible at the right of the white car. Blurry frame. Note added -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:15, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technical quality is below the FP bar, see issues Basile Morin mentioned. --Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose IMO, the quality is too low for FP. Wolverine XI 19:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 11:00, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blühendes Strand-Milchkraut (Glaux maritima) am Strand von Norderney 03.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2024 at 14:41:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Primulaceae
Info created by Stephan Sprinz - uploaded by Stephan Sprinz - nominated by Stephan Sprinz -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 14:41, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 14:41, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Beautiful image. There is something transparent at the tip of the upper leaves, what is that? --Wilfredor (talk) 14:56, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a focus stacking image, I wasn't able to remove all stacking artifacts --Stephan Sprinz (talk) 15:24, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You could use the tempplaete Template:Retouched picture also {{Focus stacked image}} to add this information in the file description. You could remove this border use some careful clone Wilfredor (talk) 19:27, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your suggestions. I added the focus stacked image template. Also I tried to remove the border but I wasn't able to clean it without creating new artifacts. --Stephan Sprinz (talk) 09:53, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:34, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:00, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 19:09, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 21:26, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August (talk) 08:30, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 17:28, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful flower. – Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:22, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 09:59, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, I'm impressed. Wolverine XI 19:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 11:03, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Primulaceae

File:Insel Poel, Kaltenhof, Steilküste -- 2024 -- 5496-500.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2024 at 19:12:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 19:12, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 19:12, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral No wow. ★ 17:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose *Cough cough* The composition is umm....interestingly boring. Wolverine XI 13:20, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:20, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alouette de Clotbey Jebil NP.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 21:23:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Alaudidae (Larks)
Info No FP for this species created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:23, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:23, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:47, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support beaux détails Luc Viatour (talk) 06:49, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merci :) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 11:07, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great DOF, so this is 750 mm FF. Some can see 600 mm should not be problem. --Mile (talk) 09:23, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Mile. I didn't understand you very well. It's a fixed focal length of 500mm so the only possible focal length was the equivalent of 750mm since I use an APS-C camera. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 11:06, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@El Golli Mohamed It's connected with conversation bellow. --Mile (talk) 13:24, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I understand now :) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 14:15, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 21:12, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well composed. Outstanding DoF and level of detail. --August (talk) 21:26, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:05, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per August. – Aristeas (talk) 10:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:18, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 03:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support But I would crop a part of the unsharp foreground --Llez (talk) 08:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:06, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:52, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:52, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Alaudidae (Larks)

File:020 The lion king Snyggve in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 02:43:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info Wild lion (Panthera leo) Snyggve, son of C-Boy, laying on a lava rock in the Serengeti National Park. Standing on top of the lava rock allows the lion to have a clear view of its territory. Created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:43, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:43, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems staged, like this one. Really a great actor, this lion :-) I wonder if artificial intelligence will compete one day -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I know right, he just looks so good on both pictures that it almost looks like he was posing for a movie! But actually he was looking at a vulture at that moment and the vulture indicated a kill made by a cheetah mother (her 3 young ones were also nearby) and this lion and his brother then stood up from the rock and went walking in direction of the cheetahs until the cheetahs fled. It was really amazing to witness this whole sequence -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:28, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Film plot! -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Luc Viatour (talk) 06:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clear shot. --Mile (talk) 09:49, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:09, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support We need new pictures for the English Wikipedia's lead --Zzzs (talk) 21:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dignified grandfather.--Ermell (talk) 21:34, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Too bad he's dead. Zzzs (talk) 21:45, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great capture. but I wonder what you could have captured if you brought a laser pointer with you? :) --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 21:55, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 17:22, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:30, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August (talk) 21:33, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:28, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:37, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 03:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:20, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:24, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Will be waiting for Taka in December! Wolverine XI 19:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:07, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:52, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)

File:Brazil Nordest House interior.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2024 at 20:20:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Brazil
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 20:20, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Which city/state in Northeastern Brazil was this photo taken from? ★ 20:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
João Alfredo is a city located in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil Nordest. Located at 120.6 km away from Recife. You can see more about it here Wilfredor (talk) 21:21, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:04, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great colours and a very authentic feeling. One could wish for a little bit more DoF, but almost everything important is very sharp. – Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 04:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:23, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:29, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I will only vote for myself (I usually don’t) to commemorate my 200th FP. Of course, some party pooper might downvote, so I’d have to go to the other active nomination to write the same thing. --Wilfredor (talk) 19:42, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Brazil

File:Canoe in abandoned channel, River Ljubljanica, Slovenia.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 09:16:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info Canoe in abandoned channel, River Ljubljanica. Renomination with changed Temperature. -- Mile (talk) 09:16, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 09:16, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:23, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 00:49, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 03:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the atmosphere. Wolverine XI 19:31, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:20, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:10, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me the colors of the canoe have come into balance with nature over time.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:42, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats

File:Libelule-Anax imperator-femelle-Hamois-Luc-Viatour.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 07:08:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Aeshnidae_(Hawker_Dragonflies)
Info created by Luc Viatour (talk) 07:08, 9 August 2024 (UTC) - uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) 07:08, 9 August 2024 (UTC) - nominated by Lviatour -- Luc Viatour (talk) 07:08, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 07:08, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. -- -donald- (talk) 09:10, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It would be nice to have the technical details. --Yann (talk) 16:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The photo has all the technical info (EXIF). I shot this in my garden (Belgium Hamois) Nikon Z7, Z50mm MC and tripod 50 iso.

[3]Link to photos of my garden pond Luc Viatour (talk) 10:02, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Yann --Zzzs (talk) 17:24, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:09, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:30, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:52, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. Well processed. --August (talk) 21:24, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive! with a 50mm lens! --Tagooty (talk) 14:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:22, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:20, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 13:14, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:25, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Absolute crazy details! Wolverine XI 19:32, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:09, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 15:27, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive detail -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:22, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Aeshnidae_(Hawker_Dragonflies)

File:WR134-Hamois-06-08-2024-Luc-Viatour.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 10:44:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Disk-shaped nebula formed by the winds of the type Wolf-Rayet star WR 134. This blue nebula is embedded within an interstellar region rich in gas and dust clouds in the constellation Cygnus.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info created by Luc Viatour (talk) 10:44, 9 August 2024 (UTC) - uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) 10:44, 9 August 2024 (UTC) - nominated by Lviatour -- Luc Viatour (talk) 10:44, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 10:44, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another incredible job, I think the most complicated thing must be to carry all this equipment to the top of a mountain or peak. --Wilfredor (talk) 12:04, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Usually no mountains required for astrophotography (not many of those in Hamois, Belgium where this is taken), just absence of too much disturbing light or air pollution. When I do aurora photos, I just load my stuff in a shopping caddy and head out to a field near a nature reserve or down to the shore of the fjord. --Cart (talk) 12:47, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I remember climbing a 5,000 meter peak (Bolivar) for 8 days to take some photos of the stars, but we arrived at the top so tired that we fell asleep in a tent, I remember that taking a step there is like running in a football stadium, my heart beats very fast, but in the middle of the night I woke up to a windless night with incredible clarity, when I saw the sky that night it was so beautiful that I simply began to cry perhaps also affected by the lack of oxygen, I could not think rationally and take the photos properly, but I remember that the sky there is completely different, the stars are brighter and you can see the shapes of the constellations, it is very different from the sky we see.1 2 3 Wilfredor (talk) 13:37, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer my caddy. :-) Thankfully, we are blessed with clean and clear air here. Btw, remember we have the Perseids this weekend. Fingers crossed for no clouds! --Cart (talk) 14:21, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We hope we can have a clear day here too, it's best to get away from the city (if possible) to avoid all that light pollution. Wilfredor (talk) 15:42, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do my astrophotography right from my home terrace. I can even catch some sleep during the night while my equipment snaps away automatically ;)

[4] Picture of my setup Luc Viatour (talk) 08:49, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Totally the best way to do it. :) --Cart (talk) 10:55, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 16:38, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 16:46, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have a strong craving for more astronomy pictures --Zzzs (talk) 17:04, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
'm planning on adding more, and if the skies are clear tonight, I'll snap another shot Luc Viatour (talk) 10:44, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 21:52, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a beautiful image of the region (recently I have seen many going for this otherwise obscure target, was it featured in astrobin?). --C messier (talk) 17:18, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's the perfect time to spot it up here in the Northern Hemisphere. I'm not posting on Astrobin anymore because it's a paid site, so I've switched to Telescopius. Luc Viatour (talk) 18:01, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Also works perfectly when seen as an abstract painting. – Aristeas (talk) 10:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice visuals. Wolverine XI 19:29, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:27, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:10, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:24, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Nebulae

File:Novak Djokovic - Roland-Garros - 28.05.2024.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2024 at 06:02:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
Info created by Kuberzog - uploaded by Kuberzog - nominated by Lošmi -- Lošmi (talk) 06:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great minimalist composition. -- Lošmi (talk) 06:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good compo, but need some more light. --Mile (talk) 09:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I prefer the composition like this :) --Laitche (talk) 12:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Laitche Good, put it as Alt, better option. --Mile (talk) 17:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mile:Alternatives should be made by the nominator or creator, imo. --Laitche (talk) 19:31, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. ★ 01:17, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's always polite to ask first and not just barge in on someone else's nomination. --Cart (talk) 12:47, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support El Golli Mohamed 19:06, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info Alt version, Laitche version, i added some exposure and some corrections. --Mile (talk) 09:06, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 09:06, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:51, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:42, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- User:Kuberzog 19:47, 6 August 2024 (UTC) I am the photographer, thank you for this edit which is indeed nicer.[reply]
Oppose A plus for the prominent subject and minimalism feeling, but to me it is an awkward posture, it would have got more wow with the ball closer to the racket. --Poco a poco (talk) 18:35, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Honestly, I prefer the original crop. I am supporting this one because this composition also works, and because the author of the photo approves of it. --Lošmi (talk) 04:00, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 09:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:40, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:46, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:21, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:03, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Poco.--Ermell (talk) 19:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like the idea of that composition and I think it is working well. But I have to agree with Poco. Additionally, as the image shows so much surface (sand) here, it suffers from loss of detail due to noise reduction. --August (talk) 08:36, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Strange angle and no wow. Wolverine XI 19:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports#Individual sports

The chosen alternative is: File:Novak Djokovic - Roland-Garros - 28.05.2024 croped.jpg

File:Meduses-Phyllorhiza punctata-Nausicaa-07-2024-Luc-Viatour.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 17:01:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Scyphozoa
Info created and uploaded by Luc Viatour, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 17:01, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:09, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 21:19, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 21:28, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 21:50, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:51, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful, like a quiet spaceship in the stars -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:14, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support :Thank you for this nomination Luc Viatour (talk) 08:43, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:37, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 17:15, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 17:25, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:31, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:26, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ethereal --Tagooty (talk) 12:07, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:18, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 21:46, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:24, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Incredible colors. Wolverine XI 19:25, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:06, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 19:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 22:52, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class : Scyphozoa

File:Champassak, Site de Vat Phou relief au palais des Femmes .jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 15:21:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Laos #Stone gate lintel.- (Detail)
Info Stone gate whose lintel is engraved Indra with Airavata ruling three elephants Wat Phou, Champasak Province, southern Laos created by
all by me - nominated by Pierre André Leclercq -- Pierre André ^(talk) 15:21, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pierre André ^(talk) 15:21, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain Great reliefs, but sorry I find the light better here Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stone gate with columns and Buddhist reliefs leading to a clothed statue of the Buddha seated, Wat Phou temple, Champasak, Laos.jpg. Best regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 22:52, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quiabo.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 13:13:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Vegetables (raw)
Info Okra fruits for sale at the Municipal Market of Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 13:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:23, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. – I have taken the liberty to change the gallery link: IMHO Okra fruits fit better into the “Vegetables (raw)” section. – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:27, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:38, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:10, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 22:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink#Vegetables (raw)

File:Hiena manchada (Crocuta crocuta), parque nacional de Tarangire, Tanzania, 2024-05-25, DD 26.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 21:00:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Hyaenidae_(Hyenas)
Info Spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. The spotted hyena, native to sub-Saharan Africa, is a highly successful animal, being the most common large carnivore in Africa. Its success is due in part to its adaptability and opportunism; it is primarily a hunter but may also scavenge, with the capacity to eat and digest skin, bone and other animal waste. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 17:40, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is this a male or female spotted hyena? To me this looks a female, mainly due to its relatively large size, but I could be wrong. Wolverine XI 06:28, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wolverine, I cannot tell and according to this information, it's really tricky to figure out. Poco a poco (talk) 07:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support This trickle of drool at the end of the lips... says enough about the voracity of hyenas. Luckily it doesn't look in your direction :-) Nice capture -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:24, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:05, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:32, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:47, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:41, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 22:52, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Hyaenidae_(Hyenas)

File:Ibis hadada (Bostrychia hagedash), parque nacional de Tarangire, Tanzania, 2024-05-24, DD 23.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2024 at 17:18:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Family_:_Threskiornithidae_(Ibises_and_Spoonbills)
Info Hadada ibis (Bostrychia hagedash), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. The hadada ibis, that occurs throughout Sub-Saharan Africa, is a large ibis (about 76 centimetres (30 in)) with a mean body mass of 1.2 kilograms (2.6 lb). It is named for its loud three to four note calls uttered in flight especially in the mornings and evenings when they fly out or return to their roost trees. Note: we have no FPs of genus Bostrychia. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:18, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:18, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this photo, it's a bird that is quite far away but the photo came out sharp, maybe decreasing the clarity and increasing the contrast could help, thanks for not removing the noise in this photo, sometimes noise is information --Wilfredor (talk) 18:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:22, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:12, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:14, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:34, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:18, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:53, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Long beak, uncommon bird -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:17, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:40, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:47, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Reading about lens and adaptor ystdray, i think this could be much sharper, compo is nice colors ok, but unsharp. Problem might be you set ISO to low and handshaking made it. --Mile (talk) 07:56, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Like Basile pointed out above, this bird is rare to see (in fact, I've only seen it once). Wild life shot at long distance (600 mm) and still 24 MPx. It can always be sharper but still a decent shot under the given conditions. Poco a poco (talk) 13:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:59, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Mile. --August (talk) 21:28, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TBH, this is a pretty common bird. Wolverine XI 19:51, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 22:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Family_:_Threskiornithidae_(Ibises_and_Spoonbills)

File:Front view of Jibokjae Hall under blue sky at Gyeongbokgung Palace in Seoul.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 05:20:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:37, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:46, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 17:25, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good handling of the asymmetric building (it is clever to use the main stairs as the image axis and not the geometric center of the building, and I like how the tree at the top right seems to take up the curved contour of the roof). – Aristeas (talk) 10:17, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:23, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 22:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#South Korea

File:SB Dowitcher Bath.png, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 21:48:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Limnodromus
Info created by Chuck Homler - uploaded by User:Needsmoreritalin - nominated by User:Needsmoreritalin -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 21:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 21:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why PNG and not JPEG? Yann (talk) 22:24, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think they nominated the PNG variant because it's lossless, unlike JPG. It allows users to make edits without the loss of quality. Zzzs (talk) 22:44, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bingo! JPGs are a compressed format. Also the PNG allows me to preserve the EXIF data. For whatever reason, when I use JPG, it vanishes. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:26, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great action shot, although the light isn't the best. --C messier (talk) 17:14, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it was an overcast day and there was patchy fog on the bay too. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:18, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although the dark object in the background is disturbing.--Ermell (talk) 18:51, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Privacy, please! --Zzzs (talk) 21:58, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:02, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:29, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 03:34, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:25, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:27, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:31, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:59, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:38, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting splash / action and low viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Limnodromus

File:Bloem van een Geranium palustre. 03-07-2021 (actm.).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2024 at 04:24:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Geraniaceae
Info Flower of an Geranium palustre. Focus stack of 32 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:24, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:24, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 21:59, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition and detail. Better than the FP of a similar flower. --Tagooty (talk) 12:06, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:18, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 11:03, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tagooty. – Aristeas (talk) 17:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the pink colors. Wolverine XI 19:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:34, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:12, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:52, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Geraniaceae

File:Ботанический сад, водоем.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2024 at 03:32:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Uzbekistan
Info created and uploaded by Arina Pan - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 03:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 03:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:43, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Detail is not at FP level. The compo isn't convincing to me either, the right crop feels like a crop with something missing. Poco a poco (talk) 18:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good compo and lighting. Sharpness is also good to me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:24, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice weather but ordinary midday light. The landscape in itself is not spectacular in my view. Upper right corner in the shadow, distracting object at the lower right corner. Average landscape and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:23, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It doesn't have anything special to warrant being named FP; there's no wow factor.Luc Viatour (talk) 10:05, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:13, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There are a lot of similar pictures with FP status. In order to get there, the level of detail and composition should be better. --Zzzs (talk) 06:03, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:37, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The four evangelists at the pulpit of St. Genesius (Riedböhringen), featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2024 at 09:23:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

View from the nave
Matthew
Mark
Luke
John
View from the chancel

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 09:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:53, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:44, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 6 FPs at once is a lot of FPs. Quality is good but right now I don't see what makes this pulpit special. It lacks wow to me and I couldn't find on the Internet anything special about it. Poco a poco (talk) 17:38, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info Not the pulpit itself, but the church, where it is located. St. Genesius (Riedböhringen) is the burial church of cardinal Augustin Bea, one of the most important personalities of the Second Vatican Council and personal confessor of Pope Pius XII. -- Llez (talk) 18:34, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose First and last pictures are not extraordinary, in my opinion. Unexceptional angles of view, distorsions in the first case, yellowish interior light. The four statues also seem quite repetitive. When opened individually, each image has limited wow factor, I think. The last one, if nominated alone, would certainly fail, due to the composition. Thus the only reason to be part of this set seems to show the stairs, which are not really special, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:57, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info 1.) It is not a yellowish light, but the walls are slightly beige. You can check it by comparing them with the white tablecloth in the left picture. 2.) The reason was not to show the stairs, but it was, in connection with the first picture, the only way to show the position of the four evangelists at the pulpit. --Llez (talk) 09:06, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In a set, each picture should be FP-level, and not only "in connection with" the others. That angle, with the angel from behind, numerous busy elements, uneven ground, and shadows, is particularly unappealing -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:21, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor lighting and unflattering colors, lacking a wow factor.Luc Viatour (talk) 10:02, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:45, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 17:30, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:19, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A very well done series. And a nice reproduction of the pulpit. But agree with Poco. --August (talk) 20:22, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support No complaints; great set. Wolverine XI 19:49, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good single shots with limitations on the first and last but the wow factor is limited as Basile says.--Ermell (talk) 20:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Very nice concept of splitting the altar in that kind of arrangement. But some of the images are not outstanding like the outer ones due to wider angle perspective artefacts. Additionally some are just not detailed and sharp enough for FP like the image of Mark the Evangelist. --August (talk) 20:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Others

File:Μονεμβασιά DJI 4359.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2024 at 17:09:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 17:09, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aerial view of Monemvasia, Greece. Monemvasia is a fortified town that was created during the early Byzantine period and continued to be an important settlement and sea port of the region up until the 18th century. It consists of the lower town, which is still inhabited, and the upper town, which was abandoned in the 18th century and now it is mostly reduced to ruins. Support -- C messier (talk) 17:09, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 17:23, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A very beautiful view, and certainly the most instructive view I have ever seen of this famous site. – Aristeas (talk) 08:07, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:16, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:54, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:12, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:53, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Greece

File:Rougequeue noir Douga006.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2024 at 22:23:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:23, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:23, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Harmonious colours --Tagooty (talk) 11:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:19, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 20:03, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 21:45, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice feather detail. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:13, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice birdie. Wolverine XI 19:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:02, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)

File:BBPlover Scarborough Marsh.png, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2024 at 21:35:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Pluvialis
Info created by Chuck Homler - uploaded by Chuck Homler - nominated by Chuck Homler| -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 21:32, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Already a QI. One other image of this species is an FP. Feel free to compare and decide if this image is worthy. -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 21:32, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:00, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support very detailed image Luc Viatour (talk) 04:09, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:27, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice low level POV El Golli Mohamed 19:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I have some video from that day. I was laying in the mudflat and getting squirt by clams. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:43, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I imagine so :) with small bubbles coming out of the mud. I love it but after two hours the back and neck pain becomes unbearable. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:02, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:25, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:53, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:12, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:36, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:55, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Pluvialis

File:Phare de Ploumanac'h 04.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2024 at 21:35:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
Info created by Stephan Sprinz - uploaded by Stephan Sprinz - nominated by Stephan Sprinz -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 21:35, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 21:35, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August (talk) 21:39, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 04:06, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:29, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 08:38, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Basile Morin --Tagooty (talk) 12:02, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:19, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:29, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very atmospheric. – Aristeas (talk) 17:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely light. Wolverine XI 19:20, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:32, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent --Wilfredor (talk) 22:53, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colors -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect light and beautiful composition for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:35, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:56, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Famberhorst. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:21, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#France

File:Interior view of Beomeosa temple with two Buddhist monks in Busan South Korea.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2024 at 02:02:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:02, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:02, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:21, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 15:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:45, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:59, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:23, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice and interesting symmetrical scene, but the harsh, cold light reflections on the outer columns spoil the composition. --August (talk) 21:24, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#South Korea

File:Anderson Varejao (51915043640).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 20:40:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Standing people
Info created by Erik Drost - uploaded by Tm - nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 20:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is very bad. Chroma noise, CA. Ball is out of focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 10:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gawthorpe Hall 2016 038.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 09:02:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United Kingdom
Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Kasir -- Kasir (talk) 09:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kasir (talk) 09:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as photographer. I've uploaded a modified version to improve perspective/fix CAs/sharpen/etc. Happy to iterate further. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:26, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:47, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like the austere architecture, but IMHO within a few minutes it would have been better illuminated. --C messier (talk) 17:24, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I can't find anything worthy of FP here. The light is not special, ~~the perspective is not corrected, CA is still there~~ and the sky is full of spots. The uninteresting foreground adds to the whole thing.--Ermell (talk) 20:06, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ermell: Happy to iterate if you can point me towards the remaining perspective and CA issues? The sky is full of *birds*, can remove them if you want. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 23:55, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - Sorry. That was a cache mistake. No Ca and perspective errors visible any more. The dots in the sky are a matter of taste.--Ermell (talk) 10:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:08, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support You should have ask to remove the stand at the entrance ;-) --Harlock81 (talk) 15:41, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:32, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United Kingdom

File:Bahram Nouraei.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 16:04:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by Setareh Malekzadeh - uploaded by Armin3001 - nominated by Mahak -- Ταπυροι (گپ) 16:04, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ταπυροι (گپ) 16:04, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The face is out of focus. --C messier (talk) 17:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: It is a beautiful image and composition but unfortunately it has irreparable technical details that go beyond the minimum requirements to be a remarkable image: Blurred face, excessive processing. --Wilfredor (talk) 23:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Портрет комнатной моли.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2024 at 21:23:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Others
Info Clothing moth (Tineola bisselliella) / Сreated by Gribkov - uploaded by Gribkov - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:23, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:23, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 09:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 10:34, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would be interesting to see how the picture was taken. I'm guessing with a microscope. The blurred transitions also suggest stacking.--Ermell (talk) 12:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 00:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support the last thing your cashmere sweater sees before it is eaten. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:54, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit tight, but still a good image. --Zzzs (talk) 04:00, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:28, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Zzzs. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:16, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Красный ^{wanna talk?} 15:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Others

File:2024-07-28 Motorsport, IDM, 89. Internationales Schleizer Dreieckrennen STP 2006 by Stepro.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 16:12:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Motorsports
Info Motorsport, IDM, 89th International Schleizer Dreieck Race: Freddie Heinrich (GER, Germany) on the back wheel after the final lap; created, uploaded and nominated by Stepro
Support -- Stepro (talk) 16:12, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very well captured moment. But the cluttered background combined with relatively harsh light spoils the composition. --August (talk) 08:28, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:22, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:23, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose due to the unappealing background. Wolverine XI 19:36, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:07, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Machado de Assis by Marc Ferrez.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 16:21:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1890-1899
Info created by Marc Ferrez - restored and uploaded by Adam Cuerden - nominated by ★ -- ★ 16:21, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Renomination. Too good not be featured. -- ★ 16:21, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 16:29, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:46, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
SupportLuc Viatour (talk) 19:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support if people are fine with a quick renom (by a different nominator, which I think helps), I certainly have no objections. I was rather surprised this didn't pass. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose What has changed since last week? Nothing? Then it's a remake of Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panoramica do Pico das Agulhas Negras.jpg/2.

I don't think it is clever to renominate again and again the same FPCs that get 5 supports or 6 supports, until you get the 7. If a picture gets lack of participation, it is usually an indicator of moderate or low wow. Then it's better to try a different candidate. Otherwise you will exhaust the participants with repetitive visuals. And we will support only to get rid of these patterns. Apart from that, this image is of low quality, in my opinion, even for the period.

and Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:HabitanteComunidadQoM(CDI-CA-MM-00005)-restored.jpg -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:59, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With all respect, Basile, if I had done it, you'd have every right to complain, but I didn't renominate it. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:15, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality for 1890? This can be explained in part due to the process of "whitening" Machado de Assis (many photographers at the time perhaps did not want to show the fact that the country's greatest writer was pardo/black). ★ 21:32, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I worked very hard to try and get the skin tone as close to correct as I could with this image. I found a report calling him a "light-skinned mestizo" - I believe the term is much more acceptable in South America - so I'm not sure what's perfect, but I did my best. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:54, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The jacket is ok but not the face -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With all respect, Adam, you're not responsible. But ArionStar had been warned several times in the past, with quite clear messages. I understand this is your picture and want it promoted, since you nominated it the first time. But both of you had voted already last week. So what do you expect? Many of us may get tired with such repetitive tasks, if it gets a norm. Let's maintain FPC as an enthusiastic and emulative voting place instead, with diversity.

If a picture fails, no problem, just accept the consensus and try something better! See the list of similar candidatures which didn't pass last month, only because one or two votes were missing:

score 5-0, score 6-0, score 5-0, score 7-4, score 13-7, score 7-4, score 5-2, score 6-1, score 5-2, score 6-0, score 5-3, score 5-0. Imagine all of them nominated for a second round, hell :-) "Okay, bad luck, I'll try again next week" :-)

We had related discussions in previous nominations and the FP talk page, and I remember most of the people consider we have to wait a relatively long period of time before renominating a picture, unless there are modifications made since the last time. Which is not the case here. Best regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:52, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you show that discussion? ★ 01:57, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eagle Nebula from ESO.jpg/2. Just read the comments -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the problem I have is I normally do wait at least 6 months (if at all), but making an example out of this makes that very hard. When was the last time a /3 nomination passed, or existed? Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frans Post - Gezicht op Olinda, Brazilië.jpg/4. ★ 16:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn one month earlier for lack of participation! Fortunately 9 years ago. First nomination 15 years ago -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question @Thi, Yann, George Chernilevsky, and Lviatour: did you notice this picture has failed just last week?

It is similar to Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Couillet - chevalements de la mine du Pêchon - 7.jpg/2 also nominated by the same user ArionEstar = ArionStar = ★ with the reason "Per 6 supports × 0 opposes.". This result may impact the voting process in the future. Adam Cuerden is certainly aware of this "tacit rule" since he made this suggestion in the FPC talk page in 2019

. @Ikan Kekek: proposed to wait at least 12 months here. Like Daniel Case's procedural oppose, many participants agree. What others think? -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:28, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the issue. Yann (talk) 06:00, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. We might have been misled by the comment associated to your template here, then? Thanks for your comment -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:41, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i was too late to notice the previous nomination and did not have time to vote in support first nomination. This renomination corrects my oversight, and i do not see a serious problem with the renomination. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:33, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(My nominations usually become a forum.) ★ 07:02, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

💡 Nice to know. Thanks for your response, George. Then it's just that FPC is currently evolving towards unpredictable directions. Will follow this case with the greatest interest!

All the best -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:41, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I agree with Basile Morin. --Tagooty (talk) 14:45, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:38, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's holiday time, some of us missed the previous nom.--MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile. --August (talk) 10:17, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:48, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical/People#1890-1899

File:Болотные Кипарисы на озере Сукко.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2024 at 20:01:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Southern_Federal_District
Info Swamp cypress, Krasnodar Krai / Сreated by HoroshilovAleksandr - uploaded by HoroshilovAleksandr - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 20:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 20:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing colour composition. --August (talk) 21:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe a bit too harsh contrast, but quite stricking image. --C messier (talk) 09:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 10:54, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 12:42, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 20:36, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:29, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 03:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:29, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wonder how these trees manage to survive with so much water. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:38, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support We already have a FP of this location taken by the same photographer only some minutes earlier, but the framing and hence the overall impression is so different that we can feature both photos. – Aristeas (talk) 15:07, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:17, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice light. And per Aristeas. I gave a strong support to the other one -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The colors and the composition are fascinating. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 11:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:52, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 20:16, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:15, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Russia#Southern_Federal_District

File:Youngzin Gemur Khar Lahaul Jun24 A7CR 00176.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2024 at 12:01:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
Info Youngzin cottage in the historic Gemoor Khar against backdrop of the Gephan range, Gemur village, Lahaul. Elevation 3,290 m (10,790 ft). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 12:01, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 12:01, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing colors! --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:37, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:31, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:53, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:40, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice contrast between the house and the surroundings in front of me.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:50, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#India

File:Charleroi - place Charles II - aménagement de 2022 - 2022-05-26 - 03.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2024 at 12:43:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium
Info created and uploaded by Jmh2o - nominated by Jmh2o -- JmH₂O^(talk) 12:43, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:10, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berlin JVA und Kriminalgericht Moabit Luftbild asv2024-07 img1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2024 at 17:44:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
Info Aerial pic of the Detention Prison (JVA Moabit) and Criminal Courthouse (Kriminalgericht) Moabit, Berlin. - All by me --A.Savin 17:44, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 17:44, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:33, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 00:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light and viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:10, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful light for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany

File:Chevalier guignette lac de Tunis011.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2024 at 22:29:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Actitis
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:29, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:29, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Automatic support for El Golli Mohamed aka the King of Tunisia. ★ 23:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you :) lol El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:15, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:01, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 10:47, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:44, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 11:16, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 08:26, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Actitis

File:Lac Gentau (6).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2024 at 15:47:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Pyrénées-Atlantiques
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:47, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:47, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:32, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 00:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:35, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice view over the lake to the mountain ranges in the mist. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:52, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Pyrénées-Atlantiques

File:Vietnam peace agreement signing, 27580141, new.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 22:33:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1970-1979
Info created by Robert LeRoy Knudsen, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Info US Secretary of State William Rogers Signing the Paris Peace Accords, 27 January 1973, at Hotel Majestic (now The Peninsula Paris). FP on English Wikipedia.
Support -- Yann (talk) 22:33, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 08:41, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Manggadua (talk) 14:46, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Manggadua: You do not meet the voting requirements (at least 50 edits). Yann (talk) 14:50, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It is noticeably tilted and a bit noisy. --C messier (talk) 17:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noise is because it is scanned from an argentic print or slide. Interior picture taken without a flash. Yann (talk) 20:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Excessive noise and bad composition. Wolverine XI 19:23, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Grain in photography is more than an imperfection; it’s part of the texture that brings the image to life. Unlike digital noise, which distorts with color blotches, grain adds an organic and authentic feel that emotionally connects with the history of photography. It’s visible even in the brightest areas, distributing evenly and creating a visual aesthetic that enriches the image rather than degrading it. While it was once something to minimize, today it is valued for its ability to add depth and character. Wilfredor (talk) 20:04, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Historic moment; good quality for the time and the difficult circumstances (see Yann’s comment); and the available light gives it a cinematic touch. – Aristeas (talk) 08:38, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:57, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ordinary historical picture. Why FP? Very grainy, bad light. Dark and poor contrasts. Tilted. Grain in analog photography is like noise in numeric pictures: synonym of bad quality. The head of the foreground is out of focus and seen from behind unappealing, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The original version has better contrast and low tones and more balanced colour contrast. --August (talk) 10:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:30, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:039 Juvenile blue wildebeest covered in mud running in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 03:08:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:04, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Well frozen at high speed, striking view with the wet mud -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Question is he playing or running away from a predator? --Wilfredor (talk) 12:56, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He was playing -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know it's a he? Wolverine XI 14:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
English is not my first langage, I should have written "it" Giles Laurent (talk) 18:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Excellent stop action, you can see how thick the mud is, the contrast of the Wildebeest and the grassland adds to the depth. Well composed, well executed. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 13:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:18, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:50, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 18:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Needsmoreritalin. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:22, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 10:27, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Muddy...Wolverine XI 14:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Needsmoreritalin. – Aristeas (talk) 18:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 18:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:21, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)

File:Alexander Gardner by James Gardner - 1863.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2024 at 22:50:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1860-1869
Info created by James Gardner - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:50, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:50, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The paper and the picture yellowed quite a lot, and you could fix that. Yann (talk) 22:55, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's just sepia. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:57, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
IMO this is sepia: File:Alexander Gardner by James Gardner - 1863, edit.jpg. Yann (talk) 20:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That seems a little pale, and maybe off-colour. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice portrait, excellent restauration. – Aristeas (talk) 17:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A nearly perfect face and legs blurred into fog in the same photo. JukoFF (talk) 20:07, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment That’s just the depth of field; portrait photographers have always worked with limited DoF, originally just for technical, but soon also for aesthetic reasons. In this photo you can even see that the photographer used the lens tilt potential of his view camera in order to tilt (sic) the focal plane – thanks to that technique not only the face is in focus, but the hands and the frontmost (the left) leg are almost in focus, too. On the other hand the right leg and the left and right chair legs are clearly out of focus because the tilted focal plane is in front of them. That’s unavoidable. – Today many portrait photographers strive for an extremely small depth of field, using apertures like ƒ/1.2, so that only the pupil of one of the eyes is sharp. In the light of this trend we should not criticize portrait photographs from the 1860s for not using focus stacking, should we? – Aristeas (talk) 08:05, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:01, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 08:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lac Bersau (3).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2024 at 15:42:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Pyrénées-Atlantiques
Info continuation of the Lacs d'Ayous story. All by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:42, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:42, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:31, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 00:50, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 03:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:28, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:39, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 18:37, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:17, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Pyrénées-Atlantiques

File:Ambras Castle, from Innsbruck.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2024 at 22:41:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Austria
Info all by -- Wilfredor (talk) 22:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light and architecture… ★ 23:25, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the contrast between the roof and columns & floor. -- Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Symmetrical beauty. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 07:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 10:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 18:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A very impressive room; effective light and composition. – Aristeas (talk) 18:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In person this is more impressive than that photo Wilfredor (talk) 04:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 14:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:34, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Austria

File:Großer Grasbrook 9 (2024)-L1005891.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 04:48:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Hamburg
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Soft color contrast of sunny yellow and cool blue, compositionally rounded off by two horizontal contrails in the sky. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Specially for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:48, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 18:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 18:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Hamburg

File:Reliefs of Shiva Dancing (Banteay Srei).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2024 at 15:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs

Info Pediment of the East Gopura Shiva Nataraj depicting Shiva dancing at Banteay Srei Srei, Siem Reap, Cambodia created by
all by me - nominated by Pierre André Leclercq -- Pierre André ^(talk) 15:21, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Pierre André ^(talk) 15:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:28, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:52, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Because the photo shows the relief only, I have taken the liberty to change the gallery link from the “Religious buildings” gallery to the “Reliefs” gallery where similar FPs reside. – Aristeas (talk) 15:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:51, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting motif but the level of detail isn't great, the crop is a bit questionable and at the top right corner there is an out of focus object, probably a finger. --C messier (talk) 13:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your comment. For information regarding a blurry object in the upper right corner, it is not a finger but the shadow cast by the relief. Please look at the portal from which the relief is extracted File:Cambodge Banteay Srei Temple (5).jpg. Best regards Pierre André ^(talk) 17:00, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with C messier, sorry. This blurry spot really looks like a finger or an intrusive object, more than a "shadow cast". There is nothing similar in other pictures of the same relief (example). The other image linked above is the same (uncropped) photo, according to the metadata (taken at the same time exactly), so it is logical that the spot is present on it too. And it was 10 years ago -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I agree, Thanks for the advices.--Pierre André ^(talk) 08:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Munch Girls on the pier.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 15:03:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Exteriors#Landscapes
Info The Girls on the Bridge by Edvard Munch - uploaded by Pimbrils, current version by 4ing - nominated by Thi
Support -- Thi (talk) 15:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:19, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:00, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 12:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Finally an excellent reproduction of another Munch painting – I mean besides the few omnipresent ones like ‘Scream’ and ‘Madonna’. – Aristeas (talk) 18:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:24, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:24, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pimbrils (talk) 17:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 20:12, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Exteriors#Landscapes

File:Edible fungi in basket 2022 G5.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 19:54:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Vegetables (raw)
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely --Wilfredor (talk) 21:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:50, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 22:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Soft natural light -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile, and pleasant color scheme. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 09:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 13:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 13:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 18:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Can you let me know which lens did you use, please? --Terragio67 (talk) 21:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Terragio67: according to exif metadata, "EF50mm f/1.4 USM" (Canon) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is my favorite lens. Very fast, bright and sharp. Pictures with this lens are always without CA --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:48, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:13, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:31, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple, yet well-taken. Wolverine XI 22:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 20:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink#Vegetables (raw)

File:Ford Madox Brown - The Last of England - Google Art Project.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 15:08:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Duos_(depictions_of_two_people)
Info Ford Madox Brown: The Last of England (1855) - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by Thi
Support -- Thi (talk) 15:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 15:41, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:37, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Overwhelming level of detail. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Original style, excellent reproduction. – Aristeas (talk) 18:52, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:10, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 20:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/People#Duos_(depictions_of_two_people)

File:Guepardos (Acinonyx jubatus), parque nacional de Tarangire, Tanzania, 2024-05-24, DD 55.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 18:39:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Felidae_(Felids)
Info Cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice pose. Could you indicate if these are male or female? Yann (talk) 18:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent expresion, for a moment I thought they were procreating --Wilfredor (talk) 18:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 18:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 19:05, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:38, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Attitudes. One is perfectly calm, the other clearly dominating -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 12:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 13:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 18:16, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are purple edges, especially on the white flowers at the bottom left. Fixable --Llez (talk) 10:30, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Poco a poco (talk) 13:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent image of the fastest land animal. Wolverine XI 22:11, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 20:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Felidae_(Felids)

File:Aurora and perseids.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 16:38:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Aurora
Info created by Stephan Sprinz - uploaded by Stephan Sprinz - nominated by Stephan Sprinz -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:38, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This image is a composite (meteors from different exposures were added without changing their position in the sky), if you find any artifact let me know :) Also, I wasn't sure in which FP gallery this could be placed since the galleries for aurora, Astronomy (Sky) and Composite images would fit. -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:38, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support for sure --Wilfredor (talk) 17:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! Yann (talk) 18:44, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow in its magnitude. ★ 19:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 19:47, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terrific image! -- Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is something special, what a firework of colors! -- Radomianin (talk) 06:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:16, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A rare moment that aurora and perseids occurred simultaneously. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect. It has several features in one shot: it's a rarity, the atmosphere and colours are incredible, and also very well processed picture, only few noise and posterization for an ISO value of 10,000. Picture that makes one jealous --A.Savin 09:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:25, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 12:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great. I wonder if one should clone out the unsharp camera/tripod at the right ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 18:53, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:26, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LucaLindholm (talk) 07:12, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 20:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural_phenomena#Aurora

File:Colobo rojo de Zanzíbar (Piliocolobus kirkii), parque nacional de la Bahía Jozani Chwaka, Zanzíbar, Tanzania, 2024-06-02, DD 26.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 03:43:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Cercopithecidae_(Old_World_Monkeys)
Info Portrait of a Zanzibar red colobus (Piliocolobus kirkii), Jozani Chwaka Bay National Park, Zanzibar, Tanzania. This species of red colobus monkey is endemic to Unguja, the main island of the Zanzibar Archipelago, off the coast of Tanzania. It is now classified as an endangered species and in the mid-1990s was adopted as the flagship species for conservation in Zanzibar but the population is still decreasing. Note: we have no FPs of the genus Piliocolobus. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 03:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 03:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 11:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tmv (talk) 15:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 18:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Disracting BG--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:27, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:35, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual expression, exceptional detail --Tagooty (talk) 13:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:50, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:29, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 14:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Now that's an unusual look. Wolverine XI 22:08, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:11, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 20:09, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)

File:031 Saddle-billed stork in flight in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 00:39:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Top as usual. ★ 00:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is it just me or does part of the bird have a halo effect? Maybe it's from sharpening? I don't know, I'm tired. --Zzzs (talk) 01:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Most of it was depth of field (unavoidable, especially at 600mm) that was sharpened. I reprocessed it to better resharpen it. There's now only a tiny bit left but it's very small motion blur (sometimes happens still at 1/2000s) but I think it's not significant and almost all birds in flight pictures will have it -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now that's better. Support --Zzzs (talk) 03:31, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great capture. Nice beak. Difficult shot of a bird in flight. Well frozen. I don't think the halo (if there is) is significant, but it's possible for me to see a very tiny line below the head and neck. There are also artifacts between the legs. Really no big deal -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I just uploaded a new file to fix artifacts and tiny line -- Giles Laurent (talk) 02:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

👍Improved -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support Tack sharp, bird in flight. Bravo! --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:40, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:23, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Setting new standard ? --Mile (talk) 11:02, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 12:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 13:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 13:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support awesome.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nicely done. Wolverine XI 17:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support! --Terragio67 (talk) 21:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great. – Aristeas (talk) 10:27, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 17:54, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support LucaLindholm (talk) 09:09, 17 August 2024 (local time)
Support --BigDom (talk) 14:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 27 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)

File:MKr25402 Steven Spielberg (Berlinale 2023).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 10:26:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info Probably the most famous living filmmaker. Created and uploaded by Martin Kraft - nominated by ★ -- ★ 10:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 10:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 12:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice portrait --Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:24, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support really good portrait. --Seewolf (talk) 10:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Yes, on the one hand a very good portrait. On the other, I see nothing that special here (apart from the fact that it's no less than Spielberg). The straight frontal look is rather uninteresting, and so is the grey background. The resolution is just okay for QI. Even this photo (also from Berlinale'23) I find more interesting, though not enough fot FP either. --A.Savin 10:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:26, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Shot with a camera capable of 45 Megapixel this image only has 3,2 Megapixel. What happened? Did you downscale it? Can you provide a version in full resolution? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Augustgeyler (talk • contribs)
Weak oppose No reason for the resolution to be this small. BigDom (talk) 14:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I'm convinced that we shouldn't feature small images in 2024. ★ 13:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGC6888-et Bulle de savon-13-08-2024-Hamois-Luc-Viatour.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 13:47:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info created by Luc Viatour (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC) - uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC) - nominated by Lviatour -- Luc Viatour (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why is the middle of Cresent nebula brown? It doesn't look like the other images of that nebula. --C messier (talk) 14:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In astrophotography, it's necessary to perform an RGB recomposition. Depending on the chosen color palettes, the results can vary. False colors in the Hubble style or, as here, as close as possible to natural RGB, the OIII gases dominate in blue, the Ha gases in red, and interstellar dust can vary from brown to black. Another example here (non-free image):

[5]https://telescope.live/sites/default/files/styles/photo_main/public/2021-07/NGC%206888-202008-RC700-L%28SHO%29%20%28RGBStars%29_Nicolas%20ROLLAND_signature.jpg?itok=8LMMkb83 Luc Viatour (talk) 15:02, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I know and also the thin red and blue ribbon like structures in the middle of the nebula are what is makes it so attractive to photograph. We have also here in Commons some nice images of the Cresent Nebula, but don't appear brown in the middle. C messier (talk) 16:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your point is well taken. I've changed the color scheme. Luc Viatour (talk) 19:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 08:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:44, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:44, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:33, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful. Your photos make me want to rewatch Carl Sagan's Cosmos. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:54, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:47, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:12, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Nebulae

File:Migratory Mexican field worker's home on the edge of a frozen pea field, Imperial Valley, California, 8b38632, edit.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 07:04:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1930-1939
Info created by Dorothea Lange, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Info Migratory Mexican field worker's home on the edge of a frozen pea field, Imperial Valley, California.
Support -- Yann (talk) 07:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good oldie from famous photographer. --Mile (talk) 11:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 18:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This shelter and the girl inside, who we only notice afterwards -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:30, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:50, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for this nomination --Wilfredor (talk) 01:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice photo. Wolverine XI 19:50, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:11, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1930-1939

File:Jeune-raie-aquarium-Nausicaa-Luc-Viatour.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 13:29:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish
Info created by Luc Viatour (talk) 13:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC) - uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) 13:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC) - nominated by Lviatour -- Luc Viatour (talk) 13:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 13:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Species needs to be identified. Otherwise great image. --C messier (talk) 14:46, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I am not sufficiently expert to identify the exact species. But most likely a young Raja undulata Luc Viatour (talk) 15:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I had a look through the aquarius page it looks a lot like a thornback skate. C messier (talk) 17:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice ventral view. This is a sea skate, order Rajiformes IMO. Little skate, maybe. Also probably juvenile and / or albino. A good ichthyologist is needed for accurate identification. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:27, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 20:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August (talk) 21:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awesome --Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:16, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 14:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fascinating. – Aristeas (talk) 17:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:47, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 14:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:12, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:12, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
SupportWow, a true eyecatcher --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:58, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish

File:Maria Alexandrovna by Winterhalter (1857, Hermitage) 2FXD.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2024 at 18:54:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits
Info uploaded by Pixel8tor - nominated by Kasir -- Kasir (talk) 18:54, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kasir (talk) 18:54, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question WB done from File:Maria Alexandrovna by Winterhalter (1857, Hermitage) 2.jpg. Should we remove the yellowish color from the paintings? ?. I'm not saying it's bad, it's just a question, could it have been the yellow light on the paint or the paint itself being yellow? --Wilfredor (talk) 19:46, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ask yourself, if we don't remove the patina on an FP of this, why should we remove it from other paintings? Restauration work on oil paintings should be done by a professional conservator-restorer to reveal the original colors, not by Photoshop. --Cart (talk) 20:08, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your clarification. I confess that I recently went to see the Mona Lisa and I confess that I found a painting with the "original" or restored colors, very different from the image I had of the Mona Lisa for so many years. It left me with a taste of falseness in my mouth, and all the paintings seemed bluish. I still have that feeling of having seen a fake Mona Lisa, even though I know it was the original. In some old objects such as coins, restoring them reduces their value because during the restoration process the passage of time is removed and sometimes implies destruction of something. I remember having taken some other photos (not in the Louvre) where the light was yellow and direct on the painting, which made the painting turn yellowish and with a reflection that I had to carefully remove in post-production, but it was not easy to find a reference point for the true color without removing the natural coloring of the painting. Wilfredor (talk) 22:42, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support JukoFF (talk) 10:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but more editing is needed to bring this painting to FP standards. Wolverine XI 19:28, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wolverine XI: What editing? There needs to be a very serious reason to edit a picture of a painting by a GLAM. Yann (talk) 18:47, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support El Golli Mohamed 19:29, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 19:50, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 00:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:28, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:27, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/People#Portraits

File:01.01.2023 - Solenidade de Posse Presidencial 39º presidente do Brasil (52621120912).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2024 at 15:01:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Palácio do Planalto - uploaded by Luiz79 - nominated by ★ -- ★ 15:01, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 15:01, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral no wow and Tokenism --Wilfredor (talk) 01:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 13:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Two days is too little time to cancel the candidature, it may be good to let other users have their say Wilfredor (talk) 16:34, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Political-like nominations are a little controversial… ★ 18:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think your decision not to pursue the nomination prematurely has anything to do with politics, since you do it all the time. Wilfredor (talk) 20:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just avoiding photos with a political bias. ★ 22:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giant tarpaulin covering a road under construction at sunrise with a colorful sky in Don Det Laos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 02:58:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:58, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:58, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual perspective, striking colours. --Tagooty (talk) 13:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:22, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tagooty – and for the fascinating folds of the tarpaulin. – Aristeas (talk) 17:56, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tagooty. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 07:26, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Laos

File:Bloem van Anthemis lemon. 18-06-2024. (d.j.b).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 04:22:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info Flower of a Anthemis lemon. Focus stack of 44 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:23, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. (Perhaps you could remove two stacking errors in the lower middle area, outside the petals on the green background.) -- Radomianin (talk) 10:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sorry, I didn't see those mistakes. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:50, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely level of detail. --C messier (talk) 05:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:07, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:25, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae

File:Ναός Αγίων Σεργίου και Βάκχου στην Κοίτα 1096.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 18:12:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Greece
Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 18:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The byzantine church of Saints Sergius and Bacchus near Kitta, Mani, Greece. Support -- C messier (talk) 18:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice angle. ★ 22:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:09, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's impressive the high level of details. --Harlock81 (talk) 17:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 12:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Greece

File:Καβούσι και Αζοριάς 0153-Pano.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 17:28:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
View of Kavousi, the modern village down the valley, and Azorias, the ancient town lying in ruins on top of the hill to the right, in Eastern Crete, Greece. Support -- C messier (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent overview of the situation both of the ancient and of the modern village. The photo makes evident why the ancient settlers of Azoria selected that place: it’s easy to defend, still flat enough for safe building, not far away from (rather) fertile ground, and one can spot the approach of enemies very early. – Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Drones present an interesting trade-off. You have an opportunity to create an image that tells a story in a way that cannot be done while standing on the ground. This image succeeds in showing the terrain features, the two settlements and the bay. Unfortunately, most drones are like cellphones with wings. But the value of this image I think exceeds the shortcomings of the image sensor. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 19:29, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 04:54, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:45, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:12, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Greece

File:Reflection Gemoor Khar Pond Lahaul Jun24 A7CR 01248.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 13:11:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info Gephan range on the right bank of the Bhaga River reflected in Gemoor Khar pond, Gemur, Lahaul, Himachal, India. Elevation 3,210 m (10,530 ft). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 13:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 13:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the contrast between the reflective water and matte algae. -- Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:35, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:26, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:38, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:14, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#India

File:Alpsee 001.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2024 at 17:30:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 17:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 17:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral No wow. ★ 17:05, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Same here, sorry Llez --A.Savin 19:26, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue of Abraham Lincoln, Lincoln Memorial (2024)-L1005507.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 04:55:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:55, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:55, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The lighting makes it special for me. Excellent technical quality of the Leica. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Somehow. Tried BW and also one with LOW saturation and like them much more. I would put it in BW. --Mile (talk) 11:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although I'd have fixed the perspective Poco a poco (talk) 13:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light. – Aristeas (talk) 18:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:46, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't understand the angle of view, the slanted base or the sharply plunging lines. --Stepro (talk) 21:16, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:10, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials

File:View in an easterly direction towards the Western Alps at the location of Grenoble.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 12:53:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France
Info created by Dktue - uploaded by Dktue - nominated by Dktue -- Dktue (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dktue (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It needs categories. Yann (talk) 18:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Zooming into the photo reveals oversharpening. -- Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive and atmospheric mountain scene. However I agree that there seems to be some oversharpening of noise; it would be nice to mitigate this. Could it be related to tonemapping? Or to problems of the raw image processor with raw images from the Fujifilm X-Trans sensor – I remember having read about that in the past. @Julesvernex2: Can you say if the special ‘worm-like’ structures in the noise are related to problems with processing the raw image files from the X-Trans sensor? – Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, those indeed look like Fuji's notorious worms! Adobe's default raw engine does a terrible job with X-Trans files, but there's two ways to get around it: i) Use Adobe's Enhance feature (I see this image was edited in Lightroom's mobile version, not sure if it's already available there); or ii) use another raw processor (e.g., DXO or Capture One). Dktue, if you don't have access to Enhance/DXO/Capture One, I can demosaic the raw file for you and send you a linear DNG file for editing. Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dear users @Dktue, Urban Versis 32, Aristeas, Yann, and Julesvernex2: If no raw file can be provided, please feel free to use the edited file available at the SwissTransfer link for an update or a derivative. I have done an appropriate, lossless denoising. It would be a pity if this nomination would be burned due to technical problems. Note as per Yann: The categories should be improved. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Radomianin, great job in reworking the JPEG, looks much better! Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Julesvernex2: Thank you very much for the explanation and the hints how to handle this problem! @Radomianin: Thank you very much for your improved version – it looks indeed much better. @Dktue: I would suggest just to upload the improved version by Radomianin – this could also help to convince more voters of the photo – and to try Julesvernex2’s hints when this problem returns with further photos. – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for editing! The enhance-details that ususally fixes the Fuji-X-trans-worms is not available on the iPad version of Lightroom. I uploaded the new version of Radomianin, thanks! --Dktue (talk) 12:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very moody capture. Thanks for using the improved version :) -- Radomianin (talk) 13:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good now! --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:49, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:18, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France

File:View of Colosseo from Ponte degli Annibaldi.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 11:40:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual view of the Coliseum. ★ 18:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is the real Colosseo tilted like the tower in Pisa? --August (talk) 20:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I used several verticals as a reference point (modern verticals) and the coliseum seems to be slightly tilted but not as much as the pisa tower. The Colosseum is about 40 cm (16 inches) lower on the south side than on the north.[6] Wilfredor (talk) 21:50, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment OK, as someone who has never ben there, I can not tell exactly if something is wrong here. But I can say the the building on the left is leaning to the left. --August (talk) 21:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks Wilfredor (talk) 22:21, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per ArionStar. -- Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition does not convince me. Croped cars also blown white car. Choped building on left - i would crop, it doesnt help to concetrate on vertical to Coloseum. --Mile (talk) 11:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Mile for your comment, I added a alt version based in this comment Wilfredor (talk) 03:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I realise it's not exactly within your control but the parked cars ruin it for me. A shame the local government allows street parking so close to a major monument. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:44, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support If you ask me the parked cars add value to the picture, it gives the scene some context that most photographers avoid giving Henrysz (talk) 15:56, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alt version

Info Thanks to Mile comment, I'm adding this alt version cuting the building and the cart, IMHO look more clean centering the Colosseo importance --Wilfredor (talk) 03:37, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think its beter than above, but will stay Neutral. Still see roof and light choped. Cloning probably would help. --Mile (talk) 10:06, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comment dear Mile, however, IMHO I think there is no way to take a street photo without cutting off a building or a car at some point. Wilfredor (talk) 12:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wilfredor I tried, and something like this , Coloseum must be more in sight, so more light and roand bellow less light, also removed roof, luster of left. You have space to sharpen it, so i did some. This was quick mode. I would enlight Coloseum even more. --Mile (talk) 15:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it's right to remove permanent landscape elements like light poles. Wilfredor (talk) 15:26, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:17, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oval portrait miniature of girl oil painting by Valentine Manchon Duchesne - with scale.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 01:14:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
Info created by Valentine Manchon Duchesne - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not a huge fan of the "1 cm" mark in the corner. -- Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. @Urban Versis 32: I'm happy to propose the alternative below if preferred. But it's a useful scale, in my opinion (like here or here), otherwise you wonder what's special in this painting. It's difficult to figure out the proportions without any clue, as it could be a standard 20 by 30 cm, or larger. The scale is discreet in the background -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is true. It seems like most prefer the scale, however I will remain neutral on this one and support the alt. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 07:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. With scale info has strongest wow-facktor IMO -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:53, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice. --Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per my above comments. -- Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I’m fine with both versions. – Aristeas (talk) 10:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Aristeas --Llez (talk) 10:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:11, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support fine with both -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info Version without scale -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this better. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per my comments on the orig. -- Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I’m fine with both versions. – Aristeas (talk) 10:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Aristeas --Llez (talk) 10:33, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:48, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support fine with both -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:47, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 10:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/People#Paintings

The chosen alternative is: File:Oval portrait miniature of girl oil painting by Valentine Manchon Duchesne - with scale.jpg

Info To explain the reason why this version has been chosen, Yann kindly asked me which version to choose (since both have the same number of supports), so I suggested to promote the version that gained the 8 votes the fastest. Thanks, everyone -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abstract spiral pattern (Unsplash).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 07:10:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Building exteriors
Info created by Samuel Zeller, uploaded by Fæ, nominated by Yann
Support I am not sure if this is interior or exterior. Does anyone know this place? -- Yann (talk) 07:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exterior, I think it's the skylight on Basel's exhibition centre, rotated 90º: Google Maps Streetview --Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Beautiful, great choice of black & white --Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great, it looks like a 3D graphic at first glance! Julesvernex2 is right, I think the exact place where it was taken is probably about 60 meters further southwest, contrary to the coordinates given on the file page. It is a tram stop. Personally, I would not classify it as an interior shot. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, fixed. Yann (talk) 08:45, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support I am sure that the architect would be very happy with how you captured their work. Wonderful image, made more dramatic by choosing to shoot black and white. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 12:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:43, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. Most other photographs of that skylight emphasize its symmetry, but by tilting the frame the photographer has created a stunning asymmetric composition. – Aristeas (talk) 15:30, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:02, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Different --Wilfredor (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:29, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 22:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:59, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Geometrical patterns playing with light -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:43, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 11:48, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 15:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Photo techniques/Black and White#Building exteriors

File:Raspberries and blackberries from Srem, Serbia.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 11:00:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)
Info Raspberries and blackberries from Srem, Serbia. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 11:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 11:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 12:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pictures of food under-represented here, and good focus in this one -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor crop and bad orientation imo. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The former of what Shagil said. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:04, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor crop --Tagooty (talk) 13:17, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support To my eyes, it's the crop and the orientation that make this image work. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree it's more creative. Same style as Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dish of blueberries.jpg. In painting, artists also voluntarily crop sometimes -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:51, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support as Julesvernex2 --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't understand this crop. It doesn't reach the FPC standard. After all, this is just a picture a fruits on a table. Easy shot and bad crop. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:02, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad crop and composition, as well as plastic disposable containers --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Julesvernex2.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 15:49, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:040 Blue wildebeest with wattled starlings in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 09:04:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Important announcement : POTY scripts have been recently rewritten and an important discussion is ongoing to know if POTY rules should be changed or not. As many people as possible should vote on this page (click here), especially FPC users (just vote, no need for big text). Thank you for your time and I wish you all a beautiful day.
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:05, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support And they say that Wattled Starlings are non-migratory. I think they found a transportation loophole. Nice capture. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:28, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 22:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Question Are these birds parasites or do they eat ticks? --Wilfredor (talk) 23:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They eat ticks -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yummy. --Zzzs (talk) 23:34, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic capture! Very nice meeting place :-) DoF is a bit shallow (F/6.3) for this long focal length, as a result the head is slightly out of focus, unfortunately. However the birds are all very good with a satisfying level of sharpness. It seems that you gave the priority to action with high speed setting (1/2000 sec), that is totally understandable in this complex situation. And the resolution is generous enough, so that the image is awesome at lower size -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 04:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Argenberg (talk) 19:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 15:54, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)

File:Olivia de Havilland, actress, 1985.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:55:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Bernard Gotfryd - uploaded by TaurusEmerald - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Incredibly sharp for the time. -- ★ 13:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August (talk) 14:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although there is little space on the left side of the photo (which can be rescued from the original scan) --Wilfredor (talk) 16:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Surely not "incredibly sharp for the time", but nonetheless very good. --A.Savin 19:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Does anyone know what kind of film this is? It looks like medium format because of the massive resolution. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good question. The description mentions “35mm (slide format)”, so it’s just full frame. It must be a slide/colour reversal film with low grain and high resolution, therefore a low ISO speed rating, probably 64; and it seems likely that Gotfryd used a Kodak film. Indeed both resolution and colours remind me much of Ektachrome 64 T, the tungsten film variant of the Kodak Ektachrome 64 film. Ektachrome 64/64 T was a very reliable film which survived the heat of an Egyptian summer as well as getting drowned in German rain showers without any colour shift. – 10:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:47, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd be inclined to tweak the levels a smidgen. It seems on the dark side. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:17, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

Info Delisted and replaced on 2024-10-11, vote: 11:0 -- Radomianin (talk) 09:27, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Babosa de mar (Chromodoris gleniei), Zanzíbar, Tanzania, 2024-06-01, DD 30.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 20:03:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Gastropoda
Info Sea slug (Goniobranchus gleniei), Zanzibar, Tanzania. This nudibranch has been reported from the Maldives and Tanzania. It can reach 7 centimetres (2.8 in), but the are usually about 4 centimetres (1.6 in) long, and usually feed on sponges. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It doesn't look real! Cool shot and a very interesting subject too. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Needsmoreritalin. – Aristeas (talk) 15:29, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:47, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:20, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class : Gastropoda

File:Blue dasher (73146).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:01:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Libellulidae_(Chasers,_Skimmers,_Darters_and_others)
Info Immature male blue dasher (Pachydiplax longipennis). (Mature males are all blue and females are yellow and black throughout). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support So fuzzy! Not the image, the dragonfly. I never realized they has so many little hairlike structures. Well captured. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 14:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support great! Luc Viatour (talk) 16:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 19:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautifully taken. Wolverine XI 20:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:12, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Libellulidae_(Chasers,_Skimmers,_Darters_and_others)

File:Rawa (50065p).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 12:54:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Poland
Info While exploring Katowice I came across this lovely view behind a tram stop. From what I understand, locals don't like the Rawa -- it has a long history of being polluted, with one finding in the 90s that it only had 14% water -- but I quite like this overgrown urban scene. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice urban scene with a little “lost places” touch; demonstrates what misguided urban planning has done to our watercourses: instead of using them as recreational opportunities and urban oases, we have degraded them to sewers and ultimately harmed ourselves in the process. – Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:31, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like the scene and it is well captured. But the large shadowed part on the right holds it from becoming FP IMO. --August (talk) 08:11, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per August. -- Karelj (talk) 10:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I cannot see anything (lighting, subject, detail, compo) that I would call extraordinary Poco a poco (talk) 11:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Building and greenery in shadow, and unappealing foreground (left and right), sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunately the shadow isn't alright.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:17, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:"Проход в другой мир".jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 22:51:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Southern Federal District
Info Krasnodar Krai / Сreated by HoroshilovAleksandr - uploaded by HoroshilovAleksandr - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 22:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 22:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 07:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:27, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Exceedingly overprocessed. File name not in accordance with Commons:File naming guidelines. --Argenberg (talk) 19:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The file has been renamed to an appropriate title. Not sure about the overprocessing part. Zzzs (talk) 23:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support This image has a big wow factor, especially with the giant gap of light in the sky, the juicy resolution. I was hesitant to upvote because of a raster issue in the middle right of the sky. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 22:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Russia is horrifyingly beautiful. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:36, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:52, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Russia#Southern Federal District

File:Cincinnati Panorama of 1848 (definitive).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 22:04:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1800-1849
Info created by Scewing - uploaded by LucaLindholm - nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 22:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 22:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not yet opened at full size but please fix the caption ("In this 2015 discussion you requested to retouch a little bit this awesome image... and here it is, just bettered (and even better categorized on Commons). Now the images are more continous, with quite the same lvl of light. What do you think about this new version?") No idea where this text comes from -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Basile Morin Oh yes, of course.

I thought that the section “description” was to present the image here as a candidate, not the description for the image itself. XD LucaLindholm (talk) 14:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Too big to be opened. ★ 22:48, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ArionStar Mmh… I could take off a little bit of quality in order to lessen the file size, and then upload it on a different file page.

For now let’s concentrate on the img itself and the adjustments made on it. LucaLindholm (talk) 14:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I prefer the larger file as you can view smaller versions if it's too big, and zooming in to the full version lets you see some super cool things, like people in different areas of the panorama. -- Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, a little bit “sizey”, but definitely worth it. :D LucaLindholm (talk) 14:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ever if need a massive restored version --Wilfredor (talk) 03:16, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is a nice concept. And I liked seeing this. This should be promoted as VI. But the image is a badly / or not even stacked panorama. Doing this today and calling in panorama would not get any support. Additionally the individual frames are in poor condition and not well restored. --August (talk) 10:15, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the original was way worse. Unfortunately some little part are missing already from the original, because at the time the daguerrotype produced some black areas around the images. The frames theirselves are in the best condition possible for an image of that type and it is just that that is so good: zooming in let's you see so many particular detail that one wouldn't expect. LucaLindholm (talk) 18:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are right. The level of detail is outstanding. August (talk) 19:53, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per August. --Milseburg (talk) 11:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support While I do agree that the panorama is badly stacked, note that the image was taken more than 150 years ago. Unless there's a way better example around the same time, I think we should give it some slack. --Zzzs (talk) 17:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Zzzs exactly: I just took off the completely obscured areas with no visual info available. I really don't think there could be a better version than the one that is alrady available here on Commons, because I think that the then photographer thought it was already good in that way. LucaLindholm (talk) 15:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per August. -- Karelj (talk) 10:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1800-1849

File:DPP 3760-1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 22:48:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District
Info Kamchatka / Created by Козинцев - uploaded by Козинцев - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 22:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 22:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Its a cool photo, but the bottom appears to have a lot of digital artifacts and the mountain isn't really clear. It might be valuable for a page about the South Kamchatka Nature Park, but I don't know that it meets the criteria for FP. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Needsmoreritalin. Looks like it has compression artifacts. Such a pity. --C messier (talk) 07:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:50, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pinson d'Afrique Jbel Serj.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 22:44:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It seems as if the bird is trying to remember something. --Wilfredor (talk) 23:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes lol El Golli Mohamed (talk) 07:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition, angle, lighting. Exquisite feather detail. Consistent with your style. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:35, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you :) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 07:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:14, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support exactly per Needsmoreritalin. – Aristeas (talk) 15:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:12, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great in my opinion: no oversharpened areas, balanced composition, good technical quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:47, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:49, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)

File:Renard roux Ichkeul.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 10:39:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:Canidae (Canids)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:39, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:39, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support What beautiful image --Wilfredor (talk) 13:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 15:09, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The hits keep coming from El Golli Mohamed. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 14:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you :) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 15:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice and balanced composition. But the focus is not sitting exactly on the eyes (or sharpness is not that good). Additionally the resolution is medium to low. I can not find anything outstanding here. --August (talk) 10:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extremely beautiful canid. Wolverine XI 19:46, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful environmental portrait. – Aristeas (talk) 09:37, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:35, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:58, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:Canidae (Canids)

White hammer oyster - Malleus albus, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 14:41:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Right valve
Left valve

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Malleidae
Info The two valves of a White hammer oyster, Malleus albus; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 20:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 10:09, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool shape. – Aristeas (talk) 15:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 16:36, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:06, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support At first glance, the shape is reminiscent of the anatomical representation of the uterus. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:02, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Malleidae

File:035 African wattled lapwing incubating eggs in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 19:42:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Vanellus
Info African wattled lapwing incubating eggs in the Serengeti National Park. Created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great perspective, sharp detail, excellent light. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 00:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 03:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:25, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support good pic, nice light --Mile (talk) 07:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful light and colours. – Aristeas (talk) 15:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:47, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good light. Appealing low view point, at bird's level -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:50, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 19:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive. Wolverine XI 20:03, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:40, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:35, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Vanellus

File:Darter August 2024-2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 15:29:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Libellulidae (Chasers, Skimmers, Darters and others)
Info A darter, probably a juvenile Crocothemis erythraea, resting on a clothes line. Notice how the wings are lowered for stability. Photo taken at Porto Covo, west coast of Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unsual and dynamic pose, nice focus. --C messier (talk) 20:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 10:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting to me. Not everything has to be focus-stacked to create a wow effect for the viewer. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. The image captures the fragility and beauty of this creature. – Aristeas (talk) 15:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:03, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:29, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Libellulidae (Chasers, Skimmers, Darters and others)

File:Deelerwoud, 09-05-2024 (actm.) 04.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 04:24:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Betulaceae
Info Deelerwoud, (the eastern part.) Split birch (probably due to lightning strike) on a heathland.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Split trees have always fascinated people, as legends and fairy tales show; this photo documents a striking specimen, and in good time (the tree is likely to crumble soon). The restrained light and the muted colours round off the picture with a fitting mood. – Aristeas (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your vote and your additional information.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per Aristeas. --Kritzolina (talk) 16:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ooligan (talk) 17:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 18:44, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very cool image. The stark beauty of the split tree over the heath. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:27, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Needsmoreritalin. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support In death, there is beauty. --Zzzs (talk) 23:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Depends who's at work :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Striking ⚡️ :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:36, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:39, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:06, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:02, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:52, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Betulaceae

File:Estornino soberbio (Lamprotornis superbus), parque nacional Serengueti, Tanzania, 2024-05-26, DD 66.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 06:11:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Sturnidae_(Starlings)
Info Superb starling (Lamprotornis superbus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 06:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but the back of the bird isn't in focus. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Sebring. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The eye is in focus, as usually required; the upper back is very sharp with fine feather details and the claw is sharp, too. – If possible, I would consider enlarging the crop a little bit, espec. at the left (lead room). – Aristeas (talk) 15:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, and I definitely agree, there is lots of detail here Poco a poco (talk) 19:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Now the image looks even more balanced. – Aristeas (talk) 17:48, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful plumage, unfortunately the light is not excellent, and the contrast between the head and the background of the same color is not very successful. Bird in shadow and globally the dark shape in front of a dark tree considerably reduces the wow factor, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination This time I cannot agree with the feedbacks abouve but this is going nowhere anymore Poco a poco (talk) 08:03, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Why? I will be happy to move to {{Abstain}} if my review is not helpful. One of the goal of FPC is to get constructive feedbacks.

And more importantly, I would be very VERY interested in learning where my review is wrong -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:15, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say your review is wrong, I said I disagree. I respect your assessment, as you, hopefully, respect mine. Poco a poco (talk) 08:50, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, then. Thanks for this clarification. Same case as here (current nomination), to give a comparison. Although the sculpture is IMO more problematic, basically it suffers from a similar (subjective) problem. Best regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 08:03, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open front door over Wat Mixay and praying bhikkhus, Vientiane, Laos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 06:34:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the image, the composition, exposure and the glorious gold colors juxtaposed with the red. I think the "wow" factor exceeds the complications of the long exposure. Some of the monk's heads show motion blur, and one is transparent. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. As many pictures were taken that day on a tripod, I could improve this effect with another frame. Side note: the image notes (gadget) should be placed on the nomination page, not on the file page, per Commons:Image annotations#Examples of inappropriate and not-informative notes. Thanks for your review -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:45, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I didn't realize that I ended up on the wrong page with that. Its a great shot! Glad you had another frame. The depth, the color, its like peering into a secret world. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 18:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I also like the slight asymmetry created by the door leaves opening to different widths and by the gathered curtains. Somehow they make the image livelier and more exciting – it is not a static view, but we seem to get an unexpected view into the life of the monks. – Aristeas (talk) 15:15, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas; quite an image --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:43, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:00, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:18, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There's still one head with significant motion blur, but overall this is excellent. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Chris Woodrich.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Laos

File:Clingmans Dome Road in snow 06 April 2024 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2024 at 06:04:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States (this gallery has sections for states, but there is currently none for the state in which this image was taken: North Carolina)
Info created by AHeneen - uploaded by AHeneen - nominated by AHeneen -- AHeneen (talk) 06:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as creator & nominator. There is a lot of detail in this image, but when viewed at 100% zoom, the sharpness should be OK. In my browser, the "original image" link on its page defaults to a much higher zoom (200%???) in which the sharpness of the trees is not the greatest. The rock face on the left foreground is naturally wet year-round and had a trickle of running water behind a layer of ice, which is why some of the ice against the rock face is dark while icicles hanging close to the rock face are bright from the sunlight shining through them. Image was taken in Nikon RAW format and only editing adjustments were to increase both highlight and shadow protection, increase overall brightness just a little, increase saturation just a little, and change white balance from "auto" to "natural light auto". -- AHeneen (talk) 06:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Really good composition. The sharpness could be better (f/8?) and a touch of CAs. --XRay 💬 11:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition, light, and mood. – Aristeas (talk) 17:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:09, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Very good composition. But I think it is over-sharpened. Is this intentional? --August (talk) 20:39, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. I'm not quite sure what you mean by over-sharpened. Isn't sharpness fixed when shooting? I disclosed the edits made to the image and the highlight/shadow protection was adjusted so there's more detail in hightlights (especially all the white snow in bright sunlight) and lowlights. AHeneen (talk) 21:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on your camera settings and your software when editing. Sharpening can be applied in both stages. August (talk) 22:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral A tad oversharpened. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Heavily over-sharpened. --August (talk) 10:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 12:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pretty but not outstanding, it is also overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 17:33, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unexceptional, sorry. Just a normal road in my view. Something special is missing, like a horse or colorful flowers -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fromelles le bunker de l'Abbiette IA59004858 (4).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 10:04:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Bunker called Teufelgraben, then of the Abbiette Fromelles Nord. It differs from other blockhouses by a casemated observatory added on its eastern flank.. Listed as a historic monument of France IA59004858. created by all by me --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:06, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Pierre André ^(talk) 10:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but when the subject doesn't have a large amount of inherent "wow" to it (IMO this does not), the photo/conditions need to be really great. The light is the biggest problem in this case. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:56, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination @Rhododendrites: Thanks for your advice, best regards --Pierre André ^(talk) 20:41, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aire-sur-la-Lys - Maison du gouverneur en2018 (2).JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2024 at 21:20:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info Formerly the 17th century Governor's Hotel, the Maison du gouverneur is listed as a historic monument of France. Aire-sur-la-Lys, Pas-de-Calais, France. created by all by me -- Pierre André ^(talk) 21:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Pierre André ^(talk) 21:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull light and nothing exeptional here. Just a picture of an old building with the good perspective. VI/QI, not FP. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sebring12Hrs This building is listed as a historical monument of France, in the urban and landscape architectural heritage protection zone. It is listed in the Mérimée database, a database on French architectural heritage from the Ministry of Culture, under the reference PA00107940. best regards Pierre André ^(talk) 10:37, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, I can see overprocessing on the cornice of the building. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
* I withdraw my nomination I agree, Thanks for the advice. --Pierre André ^(talk) 20:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zicht op de spoorbrug vanuit het verlengde van het spoor, Bestanddeelnr 657 (cropped).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 14:23:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
Info The Culemborg rail bridge in 1868, just after being completed. It was the longest of its kind in that era. This photo from the inner side features a great perspective, a modern-looking atmosphere, yet the people in the middle reminds us that is still full XIX century | Photo from the National Archives of the Netherlands, originally uploaded by Mr.Nostalgic - cropped and nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 14:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 14:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 16:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:36, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Historically valuable and an eye-catching composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:53, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 15:10, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 19:33, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good use of perspective. --Tagooty (talk) 05:30, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:00, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1850-1899

File:Grandmother preparing food inside traditional kitchen (edited).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 15:16:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info Nepali grandmother preparing food in a traditional kitchen. Created by Mithun Kunwar, edited and uploaded by Radomianin, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 15:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The original photograph was one of my personal favourites from Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 – it feels so authentic and is aesthetically very appealing because of the contrasts between light and dark and between warm and cold colours. But the original file was a bit noisy and oversaturated. Radomianin has generously created this edited version which greatly reduces the noise and also tones down the saturation a bit. (Yes, the reds are still very saturated, but IMHO realistic when we consider the combination of the vivid red paint on the wall with the warm light from the fire.) Therefore I am happy to nominate this edited version. – Aristeas (talk) 15:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great atmospheric image, thank you for your careful editing, Radomianin! --Kritzolina (talk) 16:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive composition and color scheme; thanks for the nomination, Aristeas. When compared to the original, the difference in saturation is obvious. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Very striking environment with fantastic candle lights. Appealing composition (like this one by the same author) with living subject, and excellent quality considering the low light intensity. 6 second shot, wow! Warm and beautiful -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice work. Looks better if the top cropped a little imo. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:35, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 19:15, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 19:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Evocative colours. Remarkable clarity for a 6 sec exposure. --Tagooty (talk) 05:29, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nothing much to say. Wolverine XI 15:36, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:38, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 04:52, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:34, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:17, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:18, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:36, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gyrostat (talk) 20:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 26 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work

File:León (Panthera leo), parque nacional Serengueti, Tanzania, 2024-05-27, DD 08.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 21:51:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Felidae_(Felids)
Info Female Lion (Panthera leo) resting on a tree in Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Sorry Poco but the focus is on the tail. And this tail is not particularly exciting :-) The head is clearly out of focus. Animal fleeing is also less appealing than an animal approaching. Do you have another version of the same photo session? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basile Morin: I've sharpened the head, an improvement, I agree. I do have other shots of this session, like this one but in fact I enjoy the pose here and the empty background very much. It did not actually flee, if moved around. Poco a poco (talk) 08:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The other one is a better candidate in my view. Although the lion is not fleeing, we can't really guess what it's doing and this picture showing a view from behind gives this impression -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, ok, thank for your feedback, let's see what other reviewers mean between both versions Poco a poco (talk) 11:57, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not really bothered by the fact that the head is not entirely in focus (it's sharp enough in my opinion), but there's no "wow" to me, maybe because the lion looks like he's fleeing. --Benji 16:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Ok, it didn't work. Thanks for the feedback. Poco a poco (talk) 16:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 16:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anne de Clèves - Hans Holbein le Jeune - Musée du Louvre Peintures INV 1348 ; MR 756 - version 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2024 at 08:27:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
Info created by Hans Holbein the Younger, uploaded by Shonagon, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 08:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning reproduction of an excellent portrait painting representative for its time. I have never seen Holbein’s the Younger brushwork in such detail. – Aristeas (talk) 15:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high quality for a 6400 ISO. – Terragio67 (talk) 19:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:17, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:38, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:55, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:02, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:02, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Huge resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:28, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/People#Paintings

File:GLIB Feeding Young.png, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 19:50:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Plegadis
Info created by Chuck Homler - uploaded by Chuck Homler - nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There are no FP's of this species. -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is nowhere near FP-level. I suggest you withdraw this nomination. Wolverine XI 21:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide more specific feedback? What about the image is problematic? Needsmoreritalin (talk) 23:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can do that, but I'm sleepy right now, so tomorrow. Wolverine XI 18:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Constructive criticism will assist me in nominating high quality images and in capturing better photographs. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 20:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It has been six days since you stated you would provide more information about your objection to this photo as an FP. You haven't provided any specific concerns about the image, but your statement in opposition is very strongly stated. Your opposition is currently the only one for this nomination. If you are unwilling to elaborate, could you please withdraw your opposition? Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:26, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I strongly disagree. --Zzzs (talk) 21:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you remind me when I asked for your opinion? Thanks. Wolverine XI 22:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please try to avoid escalating this into uncivil territory? I'm only replying because you mentioned that this image has terrible quality, which I disagree with. Additionally, you didn't specify why you think the image has poor quality. The nomination is currently passing in QIC, so I'm confused about why you believe this image has terrible quality. Zzzs (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's how I usually talk to friends and family; apologies if my language offended you. I don't know if I can say this in a polite way, but I don't necessarily take your opinion into account. Wolverine XI 18:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay. I'll forgive you. However, I'll suggest to include a reason in your oppose votes so the author can use thr criticism to fix the image. Thanks in advance! Zzzs (talk) 22:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It looks tilted, otherwise fine to me. More information about the location would be good, too. Poco a poco (talk) 07:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very interesting capture, really good quality. – Aristeas (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 16:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Talking about quality, it is very good. For FP - background failed you here, black on black, i can see upper part of bird since its covered. At least some white middle-bellow helped. Also, i hope you wont use 100+ MB for each photo, its around 24 MPx, do we loose so much on jpeg !? --Mile (talk) 08:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see what you are saying. I did shoot at f/4 (Prime lens at 500mm without TC) to focus on the eyes and face of the adult ibis and the exchange of food. As for the PNG, I did a quick check and it seems like I'm the only dork using it. I use PNG for lossless compression, preservation of image quality and colors. Wikipedia's suggestion is JPG, so moving forward I will post JPGs. But my previously uploaded images, already uploaded, may appear on FPC as .PNG.

Thank you for your thoughtful and considerate feedback. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 17:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, now leave as PNG, if you put jpeg over it will take another space so OK now. I will actually remove minus, to neutral. Checked again. --Mile (talk) 07:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Plegadis

File:BNR HQ 2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 14:50:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
Info created by Rangan Datta Wiki - uploaded by Rangan Datta Wiki - nominated by Rangan Datta Wiki -- Rangan Datta Wiki (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rangan Datta Wiki (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Probably the best possible view of this impressive 1906/1907 building (for some details, see e.g. this article). I like the contrast between the ambitious Indo Saracenic building and the modern Kolkata in the background. – Aristeas (talk) 10:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support But the file name could be better and the description is very poor of the --Llez (talk) 12:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The building is nice, but it's partially obscured behind the trees. The level of detail and the lighting are not good Poco a poco (talk) 11:16, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:02, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riesenburg HDR-20180418-RM-163651.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2024 at 20:01:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info Riesenburg (Giants castle) Cave in Franconian Switzerland, Germany. Looking vertically upwards through the collapsed ceiling. All by Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 20:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love this view. Wolverine XI 20:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This place scares me --Wilfredor (talk) 16:37, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:03, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:16, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:00, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:00, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great view, and looks good at small scale, but I find oversharpened trees unpleasant to look at at full resolution. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great view. I wonder whether it could/should be a little bit brighter, espec. the sky. – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria

File:Handling serpents at the Pentecostal Church of God. (Kentucky) by Russell Lee. - NARA - 541335.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 17:14:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1940-1949
Info created by Russell Lee - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Little bit of an odd image for here: I'd say it's oddly composed but very compelling. Passed En-wiki FPC easily, but Commons evaluates things differently. Vote as you see fit; I shan't take offense, but I would appreciate explanations, because, y'know, there's other images to consider, and having a good idea on how Commons stands helps with pre-filtering them. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:17, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive illustration of Pentecostal faith/superstition (depending on your own point of view). – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support For those not in the US, yes, this is actually a thing. In the early 19th century we were not as church-going as we are these days. Charismatic priests traveled from the cities to rural areas and started a variety of high-energy, exciting sects/movements. Those in turn gave way to another "awakening" that began to incorporate things like speaking in tongues, drinking poison, fire walking, faith healing, and yes, handling venomous snakes. It's dangerous garbage that actually hurts people. Worth a feature for good documentation, even if I'd rather it show one of the snake bites -- or the people in the audience with mangled hands and missing body parts (or missing family members). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:00, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 18:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 20:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1940-1949

File:MonumentoInsurgentesSilesia-KatowicePoland-edit.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2024 at 23:13:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info created by Gustaw Zemła - photographed/uploaded/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 23:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 23:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unexceptional light and composition, in my opinion. Dull sky and bland colors. The building in the background and the video camera in the foreground are not really beautiful. Also not convinced this is the best angle for this sculpture, compared to other photos on the internet. Contrast artwork / trees of the same color not working, sorry. Technically there is chromatic aberration -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped videocamera on foreground and improve lightning Ezarateesteban 17:39, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I tried to photograph this monument a couple times during Wikimania, too, and found it surprisingly difficult (light, but also background/composition). I didn't wind up uploading any of them. Maybe better with a wide angle lens... — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fontaine Trevi - Rome.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 10:24:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 10:24, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 22:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I really appreciate the straightforward composition and the atmosphere created by the lighting. However, the absence of any direct light results in a very low contrast between the foreground and the building. Just a touch of direct light on the water fountains would have helped to create separation and add depth. Additionally, I find the tightly cropped building on the far left somewhat distracting. --August (talk) 19:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alt version

Info Thanks to @Augustgeyler: for the review, I found it valid, and IMHO this version is better. I removed the building cut and I add more contrast --Wilfredor (talk) 21:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good also. Yann (talk) 17:00, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vulcan prefers this alt version.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:07, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Prefer ALT — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:59, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alt version 2

Info I apologize for pinging so many people, but I'm pinging those who have previously voted because I consider this version superior, the people capture the real atmosphere of the place. In addition to a distortion-free front view. @Yann, UnpetitproleX, JukoFF, El Golli Mohamed, Agnes Monkelbaan, MZaplotnik, SHB2000, Augustgeyler, VulcanSphere, George Chernilevsky, and Crisco 1492: --Wilfredor (talk) 02:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 03:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I prefer this version --Wilfredor (talk) 20:36, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one is the best for me. --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think this shows the reality of major landmarks. You capture the fountain, the sculptures and bas reliefs and the crowds in a well composed and well exposed image. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Fountains

The chosen alternative is: File:Fontaine Trevi - Rome.jpg

File:Fields Mountain Chah Zanskar Jun24 A7CR 00671.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2024 at 05:25:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
Info Chah, a small village nestled at the base of a barren mountain range in Zanskar in the Indian Himalayas. Population 465 (2011), elevation 3,920 m (12,860 ft). The large extent of newly-sown green fields in this arid high-altitude semi-desert is a tribute to the ingenuity and perseverance of the farmers. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 05:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 05:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination, and the viewpoint is appreciable -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 02:15, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:17, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 09:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:59, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:15, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC) but why f/18?[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#India

File:Terreirão1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:52:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Sun
Info created and uploaded by Lebobito - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 13:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 15:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice sunset image but IMHO not sufficiently impressive or unique enough to be FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:01, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:47, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with GRDN711 --Tagooty (talk) 09:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Sun

File:Cité administrative - tour en déconstruction (Colmar) (2).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:41:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 00:25, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neuschwanstein Castle 2024-02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2024 at 15:50:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
Info I know there are several FP of this castle, but this one offers more detail and higher resolution. It’s not necessarily better, just different, and none of the others are from this time of year. All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 15:50, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree, you found a good point of view and the resolution/quality is very high. -- Terragio67 (talk) 02:25, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 21:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 11:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:59, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:14, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:54, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Bavaria

File:Little Blue Fly-By.png, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 02:08:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Egretta
Info created by Chuck Homler - uploaded by Chuck Homler - nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Crop on left could be more wider for some px. --Mile (talk) 08:25, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I took your advice and went back to the original and re-cropped it and uploaded a new version. I think I may have done this wrong. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 00:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 07:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 12:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's disconcerting to merge the background with the silhouette of the bird, it's not something we should be electing. Although the dynamics of the flight is perfectly conveyed, but the quality of the photo is not very good. JukoFF (talk) 00:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Just trying to understand what you mean -- are you saying there's not enough separation between the bird and the background? — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:34, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail. Very sharp for a bird frozen in flight. Difficult shot. Impressive aerodynamic position at full size -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per JukoFF. --August (talk) 08:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per JukoFF. -- Karelj (talk) 10:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks good to me Poco a poco (talk) 17:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:20, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:43, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:34, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Egretta

File:Lauren Bacall by Bernard Gotfryd.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 16:50:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1970-1979
Info created by Bernard Gotfryd, restored and uploaded by Adam Cuerden, nominated by Yann
Comment 1970-1979 section doesn't exist yet, but it is time to create it. Yann (talk) 16:50, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For portrait photographs after from 1970 or later, please use Portraits or Black and White portraits.

★ 17:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think we could have sections in Historical up to 2000. Yann (talk) 21:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We can add a change suggestion. ★ 22:10, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Yann (talk) 16:50, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support great Portrait. --Harald Krichel (talk) 17:04, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much! Not the most difficult restoration - some dust, but not ridiculous amounts, but I think a valuable one. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:42, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Harald Krichel. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:09, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support C.S.I --Wilfredor (talk) 02:53, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:50, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:13, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical/People#1970-1979

File:Dragonblood tree in Socotra 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 20:53:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family : Asparagaceae
Info Dracaena cinnabari or the Dragonblood tree of Socotra in the Dixam plateau. Created and uploaded by Alex38 - nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 20:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:03, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support @Alex38 EXIF is missing. --Mile (talk) 11:28, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added, thanks a lot for your support ! Alex38 (talk) 12:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well exposed, great colors with the rusty branches, green "leaves" and the deep blue of the sky. The image also depicts the unique terrain that the dragonblood tree has adapted to growing in. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:40, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Maybe a little underexposed in the foreground, but I like being able to look around and see these strange trees dot the landscape at full resolution. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking Henrysz (talk) 16:37, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree that the foreground is a little underexposed, but overall I think the lighting is handled well. I do think a +10 to shadows would help this. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:49, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Rhododendrites. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:00, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 14:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:37, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Rhododendrites and Chris. – Aristeas (talk) 13:35, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support for the people under the tree - even though the tree and the landscape are great. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:14, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:12, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family : Asparagaceae

File:069 Waterbuck at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 16:28:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 21:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:37, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clean composition, high resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:49, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:05, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well exposed, composed, sharp detail - this image documents the species extremely well. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile and Needsmoreritalin. – Aristeas (talk) 13:32, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:55, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:28, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)

File:Medina of Fes, Marocco.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 13:28:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info Medina of Fes (= old, enwalled town of Fes), Marocco. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 13:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 13:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:32, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too busy, nothing stands out. A possible VI candidate. --Tagooty (talk) 05:32, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:55, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Tagooty. -- Karelj (talk) 11:54, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Dont see this would come out, thanx for vote. --Mile (talk) 08:27, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NASA astronaut Leland D. Melvin with his dogs Jake and Scout.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 07:23:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Astronauts
Info created by Robert Markowitz for NASA - uploaded by Crisco 1492 - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 07:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info This is the second nomination of this picture that features a new upload (higher resolution and sharper). Here is the first nomination.
Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 07:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Nice quality, impressive, and high EV -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Unique, which excuses (for me) the technical shortcomings. The image has its own stand-alone importance given its virality a few years ago, which gives it some extra oomph. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:42, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:57, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Zzzs (talk) 16:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Woof… I mean, wow! ★ 18:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:57, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:15, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 14:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love it --Wilfredor (talk) 02:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:39, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per ★. – Aristeas (talk) 13:37, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:22, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Space exploration#Astronauts

File:Црква светог Саве, Београд (Church of Saint Sava, 2023).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 11:25:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Serbia
Info Church of Saint Sava, Belgrade. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 11:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 11:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Please those who think buidlings shold be paralel to border skip my nomine...or show me the result. Adobe JPEG.
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Building and sky. Quite a long exposure for a drone picture -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Basile Morin True, didnt note it before, half second is overdose for handheld shot, but obviosly giroscope works perfect here. --Mile (talk) 08:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support ★ 04:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 14:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support For a small drone camera it is simply impressive. I don't know if it is possible or valid to correct the verticals in a wide angle photo, the exposure time is quite long too, I guess there was no wind and somehow it is a very stable drone. --Wilfredor (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. Very atmospheric. – Aristeas (talk) 13:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:24, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Serbia

File:Eastern amberwing (73102).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 15:43:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Libellulidae_(Chasers,_Skimmers,_Darters_and_others)
Info Eastern amberwing (Perithemis tenera). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition and quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty good shot. Wolverine XI 03:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 14:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding image --Tagooty (talk) 15:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 07:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent and beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 13:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:02, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral My expectation when looking at the category of dragonflies is pretty high. This is a common species, the level of detail is lower than most of the pictures (at least the last FPs). The compo here is though fine that's why I stay neutral. Poco a poco (talk) 19:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Libellulidae (Chasers, Skimmers, Darters and others)

File:Малый Семячик.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 18:08:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District
Info Astratovolcano located in the eastern part of Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia / Created by Елена Верещака - uploaded by Елена Верещака - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 18:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 18:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dust spots virtually everywhere, should be fixed first. --A.Savin 23:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure it's the spots and not a natural part of the landscape? I don't see them on the water surface. JukoFF (talk) 10:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are at least 18 dust spots, probably more. Most of them are very obvious. Otherwise the wow factor is there, yes -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Dear Reviewers @Елена Верещака, JukoFF, A.Savin, and Basile Morin: Thank you for pointing out the numerous dust spots. I have provided a cleaned up version under the SwissTransfer link, which you are welcome to use for an update or derivative. I hope I got them all :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 13:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! File reloaded! JukoFF (talk) 15:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Impressive capture! Thanks for using the edited version. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Now that it's been cleaned. Excellent image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Impressive image. However, the color is supposed to be turquoise, according to en:Maly Semyachik, and lake shore looks very weird to me (see note). Yann (talk) 16:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Good point, thanks for the research, Yann. Regarding the different coloration, I found the following information in the Russian language WP article: In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the color of the lake changed to turquoise, and in 2008 to azure gray. The coloration of the lake is caused by tiny sulfur particles floating in the water column and carried by underwater fumaroles. This information might help to explain this one point. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 17:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support OK then. --Yann (talk) 17:48, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Dust spots cleaned, good JukoFF. Rare sight would say. We are not used to that color. --Mile (talk) 18:07, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:49, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 20:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive view with nice light. Thanks, Radomianin, for the new version and the research -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 07:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as Basile – thank you so much, Radomianin! – Aristeas (talk) 13:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a view! Poco a poco (talk) 19:11, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:36, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:38, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:38, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:31, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:10, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District

File:Зеленый долгоносик.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 19:23:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Curculionidae (Snout Beetles/Weevils)
Info Phyllobius maculicornis / Created by Alexander Klepnev - uploaded by Alexander Klepnev - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 19:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 19:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extraordinary level of detail. The light is well handled in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Luc Viatour (talk) 14:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exceptional detail and colour --Tagooty (talk) 15:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 13:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 06:17, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:05, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family : Curculionidae (Snout Beetles/Weevils)

File:View from Tegelberg 03.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2024 at 06:16:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 06:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The resolution is great, but the quality and sharpness is not the best. -- -donald- (talk) 11:07, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Info I tried to upload a sharper version, but I didn't succeed, for the sharper version has 130MB and the maximum for upload is 100 MB (like this version). Has anyone an idea how to replace this file by the sharper 130MB version? You find the sharper version here --Llez (talk) 15:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done I have uploaded your new version (just forgot to add a helpful comment for the new version, sorry). – Aristeas (talk) 16:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    - Many thanks for your help --Llez (talk) 17:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There's a panorama stitching error on the left of the tree that is in front of the lake. Dou you think you might be able to fix it? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I'm not able to fix it in the moment --Llez (talk) 05:06, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing mud-puddling and peeing activity of Papilio krishna (Moore,1858) - Krishna Peacock.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 10:43:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 10:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 10:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:17, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 07:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a beauty! – Aristeas (talk) 13:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:07, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This image is deceptive at first glance. It looks noisy, but that is the pattern of the butterfly itself and the image allows that to be appreciated at full resolution. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:39, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:07, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 02:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:48, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:51, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:30, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent Quality --Wilfredor (talk) 15:37, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:26, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:40, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)

File:Cityvarvet January 2022 10.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 09:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Sweden
Info Lonely harbor crane on the site of the former Götaverken City Shipyards in Gothenburg a beautiful winter day. During the 1930s it was the world's biggest shipyard by launched gross registered tonnage. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 09:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 09:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The random electric scooter in the foreground sells it for me. There's use here, but not as the shipyard was originally envisioned. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful winter light and great colour contrast. – Aristeas (talk) 13:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:54, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:28, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:31, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#Sweden

File:Batalha Maio 2024-5.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 10:05:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Portugal
Info Detail of the cloister of D. João I, Monastery of Batalha, Portugal. An attempt at capturing beauty under difficult dynamic range and focus conditions. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:17, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The vivid shadow in a well balanced composition catches the eye. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Classic handling of a high-contrast scene, the shadow doubles the tracery’s beauty. – Aristeas (talk) 13:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)--Harlock81 (talk) 14:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 06:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:48, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:35, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Portugal

File:037 Cheetah close-up in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 07:51:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question – What is attached to the top of its head? —Bruce1ee^talk 12:49, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing is attached, the cheetah is completely wild and free, it's just a piece of dry grass standing on its head, something common with big cats as they like to lay on the ground -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. —Bruce1ee^talk 13:17, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 13:17, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 13:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive detail of the animal's face, although better post-processing is possibly necessary (too much noise reduction and sharpening filter) --Wilfredor (talk) 17:07, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning big cat! Wolverine XI 20:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high resolution, nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 06:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 07:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Coords would be welcome though --A.Savin 09:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good portrait. – Aristeas (talk) 13:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful Terragio67 (talk) 06:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:24, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:54, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JustEMV (talk) 01:10, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:29, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:30, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)